How Can We Determine the Value of p to Make Three Vectors Coplanar?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ryoukomaru
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3d Vectors
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the value of a parameter \( p \) in a vector \( \vec{w} \) such that three vectors \( \vec{u}, \vec{v}, \) and \( \vec{w} \) are coplanar. Participants explore the mathematical reasoning behind coplanarity, particularly through the use of cross and scalar products.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a method involving the cross product of \( \vec{u} \) and \( \vec{v} \) and the scalar product with \( \vec{w} \) to find \( p \), questioning how this proves coplanarity.
  • Another participant explains that in a linear space, all vectors start from the same origin, implying that if \( \vec{w} \) is parallel to the plane and passes through the origin, it is contained within the plane.
  • A participant introduces the interpretation of the scalar triple product as a determinant, suggesting that a zero value indicates that the vectors lie on a common plane.
  • Another participant adds that the cross product yields a vector perpendicular to the first two vectors, and if the dot product with \( \vec{w} \) is zero, then \( \vec{w} \) is coplanar with \( \vec{u} \) and \( \vec{v} \).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present various interpretations and methods related to the concept of coplanarity, but there is no consensus on the clarity of the proof or the implications of the scalar product. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the understanding of coplanarity in this context.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the implications of the scalar product and the conditions under which the vectors are considered coplanar. There are also distinctions made between linear and affine spaces that may affect interpretations.

Ryoukomaru
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
I don't have the question with me so I ll just describe it to you. It was a test question.

I was given 3 vectors [tex]\vec u[/tex], [tex]\vec v[/tex], [tex]\vec w[/tex] and [tex]\vec w[/tex] had an unknown parameter p in it.

We were supposed to calculate a value for p such that the three vectors are coplanar.

What I did was find the cross product of [tex]\vec u[/tex]and [tex]\vec v[/tex] and then take the scalar product of the product of [tex]\vec {uv}[/tex] and [tex]\vec w[/tex] and make it equal to 0 and solve for p, i.e. [tex](\vec{u} \times \vec{v}).\vec w=0[/tex]
Now apparently this was the correct answer but I do not understand how it proves that they are coplanar. Because scalar product just shows that they are perpendicular and thus the vector is parallel to the plane. But can't it just as well be below or above the plane ? :confused:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Basically in a linear space all the vectors are starting at the same origin 0, (the components just indicate the length in every direction), so that the plane is containing 0 and the vector w is in your case parallel to the plane and also passing in 0, so it's completely in the plane. (0 has to be contained in every subspace, since it is in the definition of a vector space)

Working with affine space allow every vector to have a different origin.
 
The scalar triple product (u x v) dot w can be interpreted as a determinant.
The determinant can be regarded as the signed volume of a parallelepiped ("a box with parallel sides") with sides given by the sequence of row vectors. If that volume is zero, then it's as if the box were flat. That is, the row vectors lie on a common plane.
 
I see. Now that makes sense. Thx a lot. :)
*
 
Also, the cross product produces a vector perpendicular to both vectors. If the dot product of another vector with that cross product is zero, the vector is also orthogonal to the cross product, and hence coplanar with the first two vectors.

Just another way to think about it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K