Bush as bad as bin Laden according to Canada

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fourier jr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bin Canada
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around a Canadian opinion poll suggesting that some Canadians view U.S. President George W. Bush as nearly as significant a threat to national security as Osama bin Laden. Participants explore various perspectives on U.S. foreign policy, the implications of Bush's presidency, and the reactions of Canadians to these issues.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants believe that the perception of Bush as a threat is an overreaction, suggesting that U.S. government actions have historically been problematic.
  • Others express strong criticism of Bush's leadership, citing incompetence and the disastrous consequences of the Iraq invasion.
  • There are claims that U.S. foreign policy, rather than Bush himself, is the root of the perceived threat.
  • Some participants question the relevance of bin Laden's views on Canada, suggesting he is primarily focused on the U.S.
  • Several comments highlight a divide in opinions about patriotism, with some defending the right to criticize the government while others label such criticism as unpatriotic.
  • Participants discuss the motivations of Americans wanting to immigrate to Canada, with differing views on whether these motivations are justified or hypocritical.
  • There are references to the complexities of terrorism and national defense, with some arguing that these issues are oversimplified in public discourse.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the effectiveness of U.S. policies and the motivations behind them, suggesting a mix of incompetence and intentional deception.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion features multiple competing views, with no consensus on the implications of the poll or the effectiveness of Bush's presidency. Participants express a range of opinions on patriotism, foreign policy, and the motivations behind criticism of the U.S. government.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various historical and political contexts, including past U.S. actions and the nature of terrorism, but these references are not universally accepted or agreed upon. The discussion reflects a range of assumptions and interpretations that remain unresolved.

fourier jr
Messages
764
Reaction score
13
Canadians believe U.S. President George W. Bush is almost as great a threat to our national security as Osama bin Laden, according to a government opinion poll obtained by the National Post.
http://www.canada.com/saskatoon/starphoenix/news/national/story.html?id=ee0db970-7505-416a-b61b-fd1c07e368c0

this is a bit of an overreaction I think. the US government has done everything the Bush government has done & more (like Kennedy & vietnam). it's only now that people are paying more attention.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
almost? just almost?
 
Oh yea, a Bush-bashing thread! :smile:

Here's a guy who couldn't even manage his own life, and yet he is the head of the most powerful nation in the world. Just the invasion of Iraq alone has been an ongoing fiasco. If the memos about an attack on the WTC were ignored, or Flight 93 was actually shot down, or the intelligence about terrorist connections and/or WMD in Iraq were "fixed," or the situation in Iraq has been misjudged--Not only have these things been bungled, but IMO at least some of it has involved a cover-up. Yes, incompetence + belligerence = menace, and Dubya, et al, are a menace to everyone, including our neighbors, and the American people (sound familiar?).
 
lol why would bin laden give a crap about Canada :D

And yah, go at it SOS, go sing the party line :smile:
 
Last edited:
Pengwuino said:
lol why would bin laden give a crap about Canada :D

And yah, go at it SOS, go sing the party line :smile:
I'm an Independent with plenty of criticism for both parties -- and maybe you missed the thread about all the good things Bush has done. Please feel free to share. :smile:
 
Duh!

Well, US Foreign policy rather than Bush in particular. Seems pretty obvious to me. I'm surprised that it got beaten out by international organized crime.
 
SOS2008 said:
I'm an Independent with plenty of criticism for both parties -- and maybe you missed the thread about all the good things Bush has done. Please feel free to share. :smile:

I MUST have missed THAT lol. I would remember something like that. Kind of like seeing UFO's... ur not sure what ur seeing, no one will believe you saw it, and I am skeptical as to if it exists in the first place :smile: :smile:
 
Pengwuino said:
I MUST have missed THAT lol. I would remember something like that. Kind of like seeing UFO's... ur not sure what ur seeing, no one will believe you saw it, and I am skeptical as to if it exists in the first place :smile: :smile:
I stood up for Bush in an argument the other day; Somebody said he wasn't fit to eat with pigs but I said he was :biggrin:
 
you traitor! How could you? :eek: :biggrin:
 
  • #11
interesting read...
 
  • #12
klusener said:
interesting read...
Too bad Bush and his "advisors" haven not read it. No need to ask what is at the root of terrorism. It is made very clear. Why not address these simple issues, rather than plot about how to spread democracy with record deficit spending?

Many Americans wanted to immigrate to Canada after the 2004 election, probably with hopes of being safe from all this madness.
 
  • #13
Informal Logic said:
Too bad Bush and his "advisors" haven not read it. No need to ask what is at the root of terrorism. It is made very clear. Why not address these simple issues, rather than plot about how to spread democracy with record deficit spending?

Many Americans wanted to immigrate to Canada after the 2004 election, probably with hopes of being safe from all this madness.

lol "simple"! Oh yes, terrorism and national defense is a simple matter!
:smile: :smile: :smile: :smile:

And what's with these "journalists". The articles mainly about Canada's lack of prepration for anything and the title and this thread is about Bush.

The Americans that wanted to immigrate to Canada were the draft-dodgers, the hypocrits, and the rich in America that go out and burn US flags and act like traitors (or in SOME cases, actually fit the definition of traitor to a T). None of them ever actually lived up to their cry-baby tactics and left however.
 
  • #14
Well, Penguino, I would be gone already if I could. And blind patriotism like yours is exactly why. But in my case, I had to make a choice between family and country.

But I considered leaving the ultimate act of patriotism. What would you prefer; a civil war?
 
  • #15
What, sensible journalism is considered blind patriotism?

And yes, i can see why you would htink leaving is the ultimate act of patriotism, pff! Thats like the ultimate act of law enforcement would to be evacuate a city and leave the criminals alone. But i can see why you would call that patriotism when you somehow imply that fighting against the US or supporting enemies etc etc is patriotic.
 
  • #16
Ivan Seeking said:
Well, Penguino, I would be gone already if I could. And blind patriotism like yours is exactly why. But in my case, I had to make a choice between family and country.

I can handle patriotism. It's the ignorance, jingoism, fear mongering, and xenophobia that tick me off.
 
  • #17
SOS2008 said:
Here's a guy who couldn't even manage his own life, and yet he is the head of the most powerful nation in the world.
Isn't that what makes America so great? You always get a second chance? Anyone can become president? blah blah blah, all that American dream jazz.
 
  • #18
Smurf said:
Isn't that what makes America so great? You always get a second chance? Anyone can become president? blah blah blah, all that American dream jazz.

Yah, hell, look at John Kerry. Dumb as a brick (ha, and can't see he's not because we alllll have been watchen the news lately ;)) and he's a millionaire (ok wait... he married into it, nevermind) and made it to the presidential election.
 
  • #19
Smurf said:
Isn't that what makes America so great? You always get a second chance? Anyone can become president? blah blah blah, all that American dream jazz.
As an obvious recipient of the benefits of the liberal 'affirmative action' policy to help the mentally challenged you would think Bush would be more liberal in his views. :biggrin:
 
  • #20
Pengwuino said:
lol "simple"! Oh yes, terrorism and national defense is a simple matter!
:smile: :smile: :smile: :smile:

And what's with these "journalists". The articles mainly about Canada's lack of prepration for anything and the title and this thread is about Bush.

The Americans that wanted to immigrate to Canada were the draft-dodgers, the hypocrits, and the rich in America that go out and burn US flags and act like traitors (or in SOME cases, actually fit the definition of traitor to a T). None of them ever actually lived up to their cry-baby tactics and left however.
Actually "terrorism and national defense" are that easy, but you have fallen for the propaganda of the Bush regime, and ignore information straight from Bin Laden's mouth just like they do (except with Dubya I'm not sure how much is ineptitude and how much is lying--both are disgusting).

Americans who want to immigrate to Canada want freedom and democracy (not a Police State where the White House controls everything), oh yes, and to escape ignorance. If the "blue" states split and became part of Canada, the "red" states would become a third-world country (think about it), so maybe they should be nice to us, and all the Christians should pray that never happens. As for patriotism, I kick neocon a** every chance I get because I love my country. :biggrin: :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #21
Smurf said:
Isn't that what makes America so great? You always get a second chance? Anyone can become president? blah blah blah, all that American dream jazz.
A clarification then... What makes America great is that people are supposed to have a chance for a better life based on things like merit, hard work, ethics -- you know, all the "values" people claim to care so much about.
Pengwuino said:
Yah, hell, look at John Kerry. Dumb as a brick (ha, and can't see he's not because we alllll have been watchen the news lately ;)) and he's a millionaire (ok wait... he married into it, nevermind) and made it to the presidential election.
As usual I must ask you to do some research and provide sources for your claims. John Kerry was accepted into law school (unlike Dubya), and did earn a JD degree. Also, he signed a prenup, so really his own personal wealth is far less than Dubya's. And have you watched Bush on the news? Embarrassing!

It's really frustrating to keep providing information that dispels such remarks, yet inevitably the same false claims are posted again and again. Do people even read the posts--what's the problem? :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
  • #22
SOS2008, never misunderestimate Bush's English skills...
 
  • #23
Pengwuino said:
None of them ever actually lived up to their cry-baby tactics and left however.
Let's see, you have to become a Canadian citizen (need lots of money), then employment (need jobs), then be willing to up root your family (new school, friends) -- yeh they're just pansies for not going through with it.
Pengwuino said:
...(ha, and can't see he's not because we alllll have been watchen the news lately ;))
It's really tiring, but I'll post it again:

Also interesting are the results of a CNN poll conducted May 25, 2005:

Do you think the Bush White House is trying to control the media?

YES @ 94% (7,700)

NO @ 6% (478)
I can't believe how many members are in the 6% who still watch state sponsored news (Fox).
 
  • #24
klusener said:
SOS2008, never misunderestimate Bush's English skills...
You mean at the 5th grade level that everyone can understand? I see what you mean. We could call it "Bush Speak." :smile:
 
  • #25
2CentsWorth said:
It's really tiring, but I'll post it again:
That was a poll associated with a Lou Dobbs program. Its not a scientific poll.
Further, the question is so weak as to be pretty meaningless. Just think about it - better yet, apply it to any other President and see if you can say the same thing. #1 required skill of a politician: media manipulation.
 
  • #26
SOS2008 said:
As usual I must ask you to do some research and provide sources for your claims. John Kerry was accepted into law school (unlike Dubya), and did earn a JD degree. Also, he signed a prenup, so really his own personal wealth is far less than Dubya's. And have you watched Bush on the news? Embarrassing!

Dont you watch http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2005/06/07/yale_grades_portray_kerry_as_a_lackluster_student?mode=PF

It's certainly no secret to anyone familiar with the U.S. political scene that Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts has a net worth of several million dollars,

And although it seems he did sign that pre-nup (genius woman!), he is still, like i said, a millionaire
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #27
russ_watters said:
That was a poll associated with a Lou Dobbs program. Its not a scientific poll.
Further, the question is so weak as to be pretty meaningless. Just think about it - better yet, apply it to any other President and see if you can say the same thing. #1 required skill of a politician: media manipulation.

You mean the 'other side' used a non-scientific poll and called it "proof"? I am shocked :biggrin:
 
  • #28
Pengwuino said:
Dont you watch http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2005/06/07/yale_grades_portray_kerry_as_a_lackluster_student?mode=PF



And although it seems he did sign that pre-nup (genius woman!), he is still, like i said, a millionaire
Have you actually read your own references?

The aggregate value of these five homes is roughly $29 million, but the claim that John Kerry "owns" all of these properties is problematic. John and Teresa Kerry signed a prenuptial agreement and have kept their premarital assets separate. The Boston townhouse (which John Kerry mortgaged in 2003 to finance his presidential bid) is the only one of these homes that they own as a couple; the other four belonged to Teresa before her 1995 marriage to John Kerry, and some of them are even still listed under the name of her late husband.
Also, according to the London Times, the Italian villa bought by actor George Clooney was sold a year before John Kerry announced his intention to seek the 2004 Democratic presidential nomination, and it was owned not by John or Teresa Kerry, but by Mrs. Drue Heinz, a relative of Teresa's through her marriage to John Heinz:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #29
russ_watters said:
That was a poll associated with a Lou Dobbs program. Its not a scientific poll.
Further, the question is so weak as to be pretty meaningless. Just think about it - better yet, apply it to any other President and see if you can say the same thing. #1 required skill of a politician: media manipulation.
So if CNN conduct a poll at the behest of the republican party it's scientific but if any other group commissions their services it is not. Yes that really makes a lot of sense :confused: Or do you just think CNN are incapable of organising a poll for anyone?
Also isn't your argument a little inconsistent? First you suggest the poll results are nonsense and then you argue that the same results would be found for any president.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #30
ah american want to move to cdn and cdn wants to move to america..funny ****.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 384 ·
13
Replies
384
Views
43K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K