View Single Post
mikepr@mac.co
mikepr@mac.co is offline
#23
Feb12-08, 09:16 AM
P: 3
well i thought the whole x + 1 and (x + 1) was self explanitory, but if you'd like i'll add in (x + 1) = w = x + 1. i thought my way was a bit easier to follow for the original poster since people tend to get confused when you go tossing new variables around. or maybe (x + 1) = x'. whatever.

i'm not making up my own number system. the example i used to demonstrate different kinds of infinities is over 100 years old. to be sure it doesn't have anything to do with this topic, other than if you can understand it, you can easily understand that in the orginal poster's example, n is still going to be n.

-mike