View Single Post
Mar2-08, 04:24 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
quasar987's Avatar
P: 4,771
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
I'm reading the proof of a theorem and the author claims w/o justification that a weakly lower semi-continuous function (w.l.s.c.) f:C-->R attains its min on the convex weakly compact subset C of a normed space E.

At first I though I saw why: Let a be the inf of f on C and x_n be a sequence in C such that f(x_n) --> a. Since C is weakly compact, we can find a weakly convergent subsequence x_n_k-->x, and because f is w.l.s.c., we will have f(x)<=a, thus f(x)=a.

But what reason do we have to believe that C is weakly sequentially compact, so that the bold part above is justified??

(By "weakly" I mean "under the weak topology [tex]\sigma(C,C^*)[/tex]".)
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on
Experts defend operational earthquake forecasting, counter critiques
EU urged to convert TV frequencies to mobile broadband
Sierra Nevada freshwater runoff could drop 26 percent by 2100