View Single Post
Mar2-08, 04:24 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
quasar987's Avatar
P: 4,771
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
I'm reading the proof of a theorem and the author claims w/o justification that a weakly lower semi-continuous function (w.l.s.c.) f:C-->R attains its min on the convex weakly compact subset C of a normed space E.

At first I though I saw why: Let a be the inf of f on C and x_n be a sequence in C such that f(x_n) --> a. Since C is weakly compact, we can find a weakly convergent subsequence x_n_k-->x, and because f is w.l.s.c., we will have f(x)<=a, thus f(x)=a.

But what reason do we have to believe that C is weakly sequentially compact, so that the bold part above is justified??

(By "weakly" I mean "under the weak topology [tex]\sigma(C,C^*)[/tex]".)
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on
Wildfires and other burns play bigger role in climate change, professor finds
SR Labs research to expose BadUSB next week in Vegas
New study advances 'DNA revolution,' tells butterflies' evolutionary history