Central Force Problem: Find Minimum Velocity (k,a,b,m)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ed Quanta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Central force Force
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a central force problem involving a particle subjected to a repulsive force of the form k/r^5. Participants explore how to determine the minimum linear velocity of the particle as it follows its trajectory, considering its initial conditions and the distances of closest approach, a and b. The conversation touches on concepts of potential and kinetic energy, work done by forces, and the implications of the particle's trajectory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest starting with a kinetic energy to potential energy balance to analyze the problem.
  • Others propose using integration to calculate the work done as the particle moves from infinity to the closest distance a.
  • One participant questions the role of distance b in the problem, seeking clarification on its significance in the trajectory.
  • Another participant clarifies that the particle's initial velocity is directed along a path that would miss the force center by distance b, which complicates the trajectory.
  • Some participants discuss the need to find the actual trajectory of the particle, indicating that the problem has multiple parts that require different approaches.
  • One participant provides the potential energy function derived from the force and discusses energy conservation principles.
  • Another participant notes that the second part of the problem involves finding the minimum speed at a point that is not necessarily b, as the particle will be deflected from its straight-line path.
  • There is mention of the problem resembling classic scattering problems, with b representing the impact parameter.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the simplicity of the problem, with some considering it trivial while others find it complex due to the multiple components involved. There is no consensus on how to approach the problem fully, particularly regarding the significance of distance b and the trajectory of the particle.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of the problem, particularly in terms of integrating the force and understanding the implications of the particle's trajectory. There are unresolved aspects regarding the exact relationship between distances a and b and how they influence the particle's motion.

Ed Quanta
Messages
296
Reaction score
0
A particle of mass m is subjected to a repulsive force k/r^5, where k is a constant. Initially it is at a very large distance from the force center O and has a velocity of magnitude such that, if it were directed along a path through the center of the force, the closest distance of approach would be a. Actually, it is projected, with the same velocity, along a path which would pass the force center at a distance b if it were not deflected. Find the minimum linear velocity (in terms of k,a,b,m) that the particle experiences as it follows its trajectory.

I have no idea how to go about doing this. Any suggestions would be well appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ed, looks as a trivial problem to practice with the idea of potential energy etc.
 
Thank you, and that will probably make calculations a lot messier. I apologize for being an idiot, but I don't see how this problem is so trvial. I don't suppose you could be more specific?
 
IT starts as a balanced "KE to PE" equation. At a "great distance" the potential energy is zero, so all energy is kinetic. At the closest distance, all the energy is potential. Use integration to calculate the work done to bring the object from "infinity" to distance "a." (work=force "dot" distance but the force increases as distance,r, decreases.) THis amount of work is equal to maximum PE at "a" and maximum KE at a great distance; from this you find v.
 
I'm sorry, but I am still not sure how the distance b fits into this problem. What is meant by the mass would travel a distance b through the force center if not deflected? Is b greater than the distance a?
 
Ed Quanta asks:

"What is meant by the mass would travel a distance b through the force center if not deflected?"

But that's not what the problem you originally posted says.

What it does say is: "Actually, it is projected, with the same velocity, along a path which would pass the force center at a distance b if it were not deflected."

So the starting velocity of the particle is directed along a straight line whose closest approach to the force center is the distance b. That is if the particle continued along this path, it would miss the force center by the distance b. Of course this means that the particle isn't aimed directly at the center which in turn means thatit will be pushed even further off course and will miss the force center by some distance greater than b.

Does that help?
 
So I am calculating the work done by an integral from a to infinity which is just really using the fact that potential energy is 0 when the particle is an infinite distance from the force center. And thus its potential energy is greatest when its at its closest approach to the force center a distance a. Then we calculation an integral from b to infinity and understand the work done by the force to push away the particle. And then we just examine where v is lowest during this trajectory wouldn't it be where kinetic energy is the lowest at point a? I guess the whole point is expressing this in terms of b as well though. Thanks jdavel, I think I understand.
 
arivero posted:

"looks as a trivial problem to practice with the idea of potential energy etc."

I don't think so. This is a two part problem. And unless I'm missing something here (which is certainly possible!) only the first part can be solved using just PE, KE and total energy conservation. But that first part only gives the initial conditions (speed and direction) of a particle in an unusual central potential. The second part requires that the actual trajectory of the particle be found. Doesn't it?

Also, to Ed Quanta: It looks to me as though this is a problem from an introductory QM or modern physics class where you've learned about the Rutherford scattering experiment. I can't remember whether that analysis requires that you find the distance of nearest approach of the alpha particles to the nuclei. If so, you might find help in that analysis.
 
I think what you said is pretty much on the money jdavel. Thanks for the help.
 
  • #10
The potential energy function is simply the integral of the force, so

[itex]U(x) = -\frac{k}{4r^4}[/itex]

The kinetic energy is simply

[itex]T(v) = \frac{1}{2}mv^2[/itex]

The force is conservative, so no work is done by any non-conservative forces. Therefore the energy of the object is conserved.

At point (a) the object has no kinetic energy, so the total energy is simply given by [itex]U(a)[/itex]

At its initial point the total energy is given by

[itex]U(r_o) + T(v)[/itex]

Set the initial and final energies equal to each other and solver for v.

Or did I misread the problem?
 
  • #11
JohnDubYa asked: "Or did I misread the problem?"


You didn't misread; you just didn't quite finish reading.

In the first half of the problem you were given the force and the fact that v(a)=0, from which you correctly showed how to find v(oo).

In the second part of the problem, you're given that the speed of the particle at infinity is the same as before, but now its aimed along a path whose closest approach to the force center (FC) is the distance b. If the particle actually followed this straight line path, you could figure out how fast it would be going at b (just like you did before), and since b is the closest approach, it would be the point of greatest PE, so v(b) would be the minimum speed. But since the particle isn't aimed directly at the the FC, it will get pushed off this straight line path and never go through b. So it's maximum PE will be at some other place, say b', and v(b') is now the minimum speed. Finding b' doesn't look easy to me.

What do you think?
 
  • #12
You are right, I quit reading too early.

This looks like the classic scattering problem, with b as the impact parameter. The solution should be found in many nuclear physics books, or by doing a Google search on "classical scattering cross-section impact parameter."
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K