View Single Post
Jun30-11, 07:59 AM
And there's a precedence for art being crap and remaining crap. This is nothing good, nor particularly boundary pushing, this is just an example of anti-art (or considering the rise of anti-art to art status it's anti-anti-art).
An example of this would be exceedingly long films which show nothing happening or just
. It's different yes but we can all talk about it by setting a series of metrics by which to measure by and decide that as avant-garde as this is meant to be, it remains crap.
Would anti-anti-art be art? :) What series of metrics do you mean?