Yes, I understand what you are saying. But aren't you completely tossing out everything that I had previously pointed out?
You're basically assuming a "square" situation.
You're basically saying that since it's infinitely many rows and infinitely many columns that somehow makes it doable or even "square" in the sense that it's infinity by infinity in dimension.
But you're not taking into account the observations I've given. That lists of numbers represented by numerals cannot be made into 'square' lists. Pretending that "infinity by infinity" represents a square list that can be completed is the folly.
You'd also have to ignore the limitations on the slope of any line that needs to go down these lists crossing out a digit at time.
The slope of that line cannot be made steep enough to keep up with a list that would be required to represent even the natural numbers let alone the reals.
The very assumption that this problem can be viewed as a "square" infinity-by-infinity
list is indeed the folly.
That's the false assumption right there that can't hold true.