View Single Post
Fredster1765
#6
Dec5-12, 09:07 AM
P: 14
About the first quote - I'm probably conceptualizing inertia in an entirely illogical way, but I see it as an object having some quantifiable measure of inertia, or a kind of "negative energy", so the object won't move until it's been influenced by an amount of energy equal to that deficit.. does it make sense? Or am I way off?
Right, I wasn't sure how to phrase the 2nd quote, but I mean fixed at some coordinate, or as you say, fixed in relation to the ground.

EDIT: I know there's no such thing as "negative energy", but I'm unsure how best to describe what I mean!