View Single Post
EmilyRuck is offline
Feb28-13, 09:35 AM
P: 38
In the study of electric and magnetic fields, two equations are called the constitutive relations of the medium (the vacuum, for example):

[itex]\mathbf{D} = \mathbf{\epsilon} \cdot \mathbf{E}\\
\mathbf{B} = \mathbf{\mu} \cdot \mathbf{H}[/itex]

But in a generic medium (non linear, non isotropic, non homogeneous) [itex]\mathbf{\epsilon}[/itex] and [itex]\mathbf{\mu}[/itex] are tensors. Now, why not matrices with dimension 3x3? [itex]\mathbf{E}[/itex] and [itex]\mathbf{H}[/itex] are "simple" three-dimensional vectors. I know that a matrix is a particular case of a tensor, but so why do we never use the term "matrix" in this context?
A matrix could exist only if a particolar system of coordinates is defined, whereas a tensor can always exist: is it the reason for calling [itex]\mathbf{\epsilon}[/itex] and [itex]\mathbf{\mu}[/itex] tensors and not just matrices?
Thank you anyway!

Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on
Physicists design quantum switches which can be activated by single photons
'Dressed' laser aimed at clouds may be key to inducing rain, lightning
Higher-order nonlinear optical processes observed using the SACLA X-ray free-electron laser