Bartholomew said:
Nate, please make a new post rather than editing your old one. For the benefit of recent readers... Nate's mathematical detail was not present when I replied to him previously.
Sorry - I started making a 'small' correction and got carried away...
First, how did you derive this equation? And you never define s.
Let's say that the mouse makes a turn of angle [itex]\theta[/itex] at the midpoint of some time segment of length [itex]2t[/itex]. Then the (directly chasing) will, more or less, be running along the third leg of a triangle. The law of cosines:
[tex]c^2=a^2+b^2+2ab\cos\theta[/tex]
Gives us the relative lengths of the three legs of this triangle. Solving for c
[tex]c=\sqrt{a^2+b^2+2ab\cos\theta}[/tex]
Now there's a couple of potentially illegitemate simplifications.
Now
[tex]a+b-c[/tex]
is the difference in the distances that the two had to travel. So it's the amount that the cat gains on the mouse.
[tex]a+b-\sqrt{a^2+b^2+2ab\cos\theta}[/tex]
I made the simplifying assumption that both legs of the triangle have the same length, and that they're equal in length to [itex]st[/itex] the speed of the cat and mouse, multiplied by some length of time. This simplifies to
[tex]st(2-\sqrt{2+2\cos\theta})[/tex]
(Which is different than what I have above.)
Now, if we look at the possibility of many small turns over time, rather than one large turn...
[tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}s n\times\frac{t}{n} \left(2 - \sqrt{2+2\cos\frac{\theta}{n})\right[/tex]
Which does go to zero - so direct chasing will not work, and the previous derivation was flawed.
Second, the equation is wrong because it has no term to account for the fact that when the cat gets closer to the mouse, his radius of rotation becomes larger, so he gains on the mouse more and more slowly.
Actually, in either version, the [itex]\theta[/itex] would get smaller or the [itex]t[/itex] would get larger for a larger radius of curvature.