Register to reply

PF Photo Contest Winners

by ZapperZ
Tags: contest, photo, winners
Share this thread:
ZapperZ
#1
May17-06, 11:16 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
ZapperZ's Avatar
P: 29,238
Well done to everyone who participated!

Your neighborhood/City

1. 0TheSwerve0
2. hypatia
3. Burnsys
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Mysterious source of ozone-depleting chemical baffles NASA
Water leads to chemical that gunks up biofuels production
How lizards regenerate their tails: Researchers discover genetic 'recipe'
Evo
#2
May17-06, 11:25 AM
Mentor
Evo's Avatar
P: 26,523
Congratulations guys!!!!!

That was a really hard one to decide on.
heartless
#3
May17-06, 11:48 AM
P: 214
congratz guys! :)

scorpa
#4
May17-06, 02:52 PM
P: 372
PF Photo Contest Winners

Congrats guys! They were all great pics!!
hypatia
#5
May17-06, 07:50 PM
hypatia's Avatar
P: 1,298
awww thanks all who voted!
I really enjoyed seeing the sights everyone posted...in my book everyones a winner!
SimplySolitary_
#6
May17-06, 08:39 PM
P: 56
Why am I not surprised that Swerve won?! Deserved it, though... :) Great job, guys!! I'm so impressed at the quality of some of these pics.
Burnsys
#7
May19-06, 07:05 AM
P: 655
Thanks everybody!!

Here is the picture in fullress and other pictures of the same view..

http://200.49.210.251/chasco/Contest/
ZapperZ
#8
May21-06, 05:15 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
ZapperZ's Avatar
P: 29,238
Congratulations to all who participated.

1. (tie) detta ; 0TheSwerve0
2. larkspur
3. Integral

Zz.
ZapperZ
#9
Jun11-06, 11:37 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
ZapperZ's Avatar
P: 29,238
Another terrific set of pictures for this contest. I'm sure I speak for everyone that this was one very tough contest to pick just one. Congratulations to everyone who participated, and to the winners.

1. brewnog
2. Toxicbug
3. J77

Zz.
ZapperZ
#10
Jun11-06, 11:47 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
ZapperZ's Avatar
P: 29,238
A smaller number of entries, but no shortage of quality. We do have a runaway winner, but every picture in this contest is wonderful.

1. Integral
2. Aether
3. 0TheSwerve0

Zz.
ZapperZ
#11
Jun23-06, 08:44 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
ZapperZ's Avatar
P: 29,238
It was a tough contest to pick, and an even tougher one to pick among the final three. So well done to everyone who submitted a picture. A special congratulations to our 3 winners.

1. larkspur
2. Toxicbug
3. Chi Meson

Contest thread.

Zz.
scott1
#12
Jun23-06, 03:50 PM
P: 459
So are the PF Photo contest over?
larkspur
#13
Jun23-06, 04:08 PM
larkspur's Avatar
P: 791
Quote Quote by scott1
So are the PF Photo contest over?
No,there is a new one now
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=124404
scott1
#14
Jun23-06, 05:16 PM
P: 459
Quote Quote by larkspur
But will it be over after that one?
scorpa
#15
Jun29-06, 08:52 AM
P: 372
Is the Gone But Not Forgotten Contest done now? That one seemed to be quite a while ago but I dont remember seeing the results.
ZapperZ
#16
Jun29-06, 09:23 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
ZapperZ's Avatar
P: 29,238
I just haven't gotten around to it. I'll try to catch up with that soon.

Zz.
ZapperZ
#17
Jun29-06, 08:08 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
ZapperZ's Avatar
P: 29,238
It was a difficult contest, at least for me. Nevertheless, we had many creative people with cameras, and the voting was TIGHT. So congratulations to everyone!

1. brewnog
2 (tie) Integral, Moonbear, scorpa
3 (tie) hypnagogue, chroot

Zz.
ZapperZ
#18
Jul8-06, 10:29 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
ZapperZ's Avatar
P: 29,238
I don't know how people made their choices for this contest. It was impossibly difficult to choose just one picture. Congratulations to the winners and all those who participated.

1. ZapperZ
2. hypnagogue
3. Ivan Seeking

Contest thread.

Zz.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
PF PHOTO CONTEST - I Kid You Not (5/24-5/30) General Discussion 39
PF PHOTO CONTEST - This is Halloween! (10/27-11/2) General Discussion 12
PF PHOTO CONTEST - Now That Looks Like Fun (6/23-6/29) General Discussion 13
Pf Photo Contest - Play It Again Sam! (5/19-5/25) General Discussion 35