| Thread Closed |
piece wise continuity |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Nov1-06, 01:21 PM | #1 |
|
|
piece wise continuity
I have a question that asks to show that f(x)=x^2(sin[1/x]) is piecewise continuous in the interval (0,1). I need to show that I partition the interval in to finite intervals and the function is continous within the subintervals and have discontinuities of te first type at the endpoints. I tried using any multiple of pi. That doesn't work. Any hints?
|
| Nov1-06, 01:34 PM | #2 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Is that:
[tex]x^2 \sin \left \frac{1}{x} \right [/tex] ? Because that function is just continuous in (0,1), so it's obviously piecewise continuous. Or does [1/x] mean the integer part of 1/x? If so, then it seems like the natural thing to do is divide up (0,1) into the regions where [1/x] takes distinct values (ie, (1/2,1],(1/3,1/2], etc.). |
| Nov1-06, 01:43 PM | #3 |
|
|
[tex]x^2 \sin \left \frac{1}{x} \right [/tex]
Is the correct function, which you indicated. The exact question is as follows: A function f is called piecewise continuous (sectionally continuous) on an interval (a,b) if there are finitely many point a = x(sub o) < x(sub 1) < ... < x(sub n) = b such that (a) f is continuous on each subinterval x(sub o) < x < x(sub 1) , x(sub 1) < x < x(sub 2) , ... , x(sub n-1) < x < x(sub n), and (b) f has discontinuities of the first kind at the point x(sub o),x(sub 1), ... , x (sub n). The function f(x) need not be defined at the points x(sub o),x(sub 1), ... , x (sub n). Show that the following functions are piecewise continuous: f(x) = [tex]x^2 \sin \left \frac{1}{x} \right [/tex] , 0 < x < 1 |
| Nov1-06, 01:46 PM | #4 |
|
Recognitions:
|
piece wise continuity
Right, and do you see why that is continuous in the ordinary sense (or piecewise continuous with a trivial partition of (0,1))?
|
| Nov1-06, 01:51 PM | #5 |
|
|
It seems like the question wants a further partition of (0,1). The left limit doesn't exist here so I'm confused as to why the function has a discontinutiy of type 1 on the trivial interval (0,1)
|
| Nov1-06, 03:21 PM | #6 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Well the left limit does exist, but this doesn't matter because 0 isn't in your range. The fact is there are no discontinuities anywhere. A function doesn't have to have any discontinuities to be piecewise continuous. The definition you gave above is a little awkward, but it doesn't rule out the possibility that the number of discontinuities is zero (which is finite), and this is certainly allowed.
|
| Nov1-06, 05:42 PM | #7 |
|
|
Maybe I don't understand the definition of the limit then. As we approach 0 the lim sup from the right is not the same as the lim inf from the right, therefore the limit from the right does not exist.
|
| Nov1-06, 06:11 PM | #8 |
|
Recognitions:
|
What do you get as the limsup and liminf?
|
| Nov1-06, 08:32 PM | #9 |
|
|
0 for both. My bad.
|
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: piece wise continuity
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| [SOLVED] Continuity on a piece-wise function | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 7 | ||
| piece wise function and Laplace Transform | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 1 | ||
| Derivative of Piece-Wise Function | Introductory Physics Homework | 3 | ||
| Piece-wise Function | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 2 | ||
| The Schrodinger Equation solved piece by piece | Quantum Physics | 2 | ||