
#1
Mar2109, 04:08 PM

P: 360

How would you Divide very large numbers without using a calculator?
EX. [tex]\frac{125000}{299000000}[/tex] 



#2
Mar2109, 04:23 PM

P: 144

Long ago, before calculators, logarithms were used and invented for this purpose. You'd divide by subtracting logarithms and antilog the result to get the answer.




#3
Mar2109, 05:40 PM

P: 104

One should usually first take out the obvious powers of ten, then factorize.
e.g. [tex]\frac{125000}{299000000} = \frac{125}{299000}=\frac{5^3}{299\cdot 10^3} = \frac{5^3}{299\cdot (2\cdot 5)^3} = \frac{1}{299\cdot 2^3}[/tex] And [tex]299\cdot 8 = 3 \cdot 10^2 \cdot 8  8 = 24 \cdot 10^2  8 = 2400  8 = 2392[/tex], so that [tex]\frac{125000}{299000000} = \frac{1}{2392}[/tex] Which by hand is good enough for me. (This might be wrong tho, it is kinda late here) 



#4
Mar2209, 12:24 AM

P: 288

Dividing large numbers
"How would you Divide very large numbers without using a calculator? "
Long division is a correct algorithm. Are you asking whether or not there exists a faster way? 



#5
Mar2209, 12:35 PM

P: 360





#7
Mar2209, 01:49 PM

P: 2,159

You could use NewtonRaphson. Computing x = 1/y for given y amounts to solving the equation:
1/x  y = 0 Then, NewtonRaphson yields the following recursion for the nth approximation x_{n+1} = x_n  (1/x_n  y)/(1/x_n^2) = x_n +x_n y x_n^2 = 2 x_n  y x_n^2 The iteration doesn't involve any divisions, so it is a true division algorithm. The number of correct digits doubles after each iteration, while with long division you only get one decimal at a time, so it is much faster than long division. 



#8
Mar2209, 02:01 PM

P: 2,159




Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Multiplying Large Numbers  Linear & Abstract Algebra  2  
dvisibility of large numbers  Calculus & Beyond Homework  4  
Strong Law of Large Numbers  Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics  1  
Law of Large Numbers  Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics  1  
Dirac,large numbers and cosmology  General Astronomy  11 