Register to reply

Water Flow, Pump Effect

by TorMcOst
Tags: effect, flow, pump, water
Share this thread:
TorMcOst
#1
Apr13-09, 02:11 PM
P: 9
Dear all,

I have worked with a challenge for two full days now without managing to solve it. I would be MOST grateful if anyone could help me sort out my confusion concerning the problem.

I have a suction hose (100m, 5cm) that is connected to a larger mouthpiece in the end ( 30cm). The suction end of the hose is submerged to 7 m draught and the other end are connected to a pump (sucking 60 l/min) in an assisting vessel (2m above surface area). The mouthpiece will be placed 1,5cm from the seabed and are ment to suck up all loose particles on the seabed.

Q1. What will the speed of the water passing between the seabed and the sucking mouthpiece be?

Q2. Would a 60 l/min suction pump be sufficient in order to pump up all loose particles if the sucking mouthpiece were moved over the seabed with 0,7 m/s (still 1,5cm distance between seabed and mouthpiece)?

Q3. How much smaller pump would be needed if the pump was placed right behind the sucking mouthpiece on the seabed?

Thank you very much in advance!

Yours Faithfully,

Tor
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
An interesting glimpse into how future state-of-the-art electronics might work
Tissue regeneration using anti-inflammatory nanomolecules
C2D2 fighting corrosion
ericgrau
#2
Apr20-09, 01:15 PM
P: 20
Q1.
Q = vA (flow = velocity times area)
v = Q / A
Q = 60 L / min = 1 L / s = 0.001 m^3/s
A (cylinder) = pi * 0.30m * 0.015m = 0.01413 m^2
V = Q / A = 0.071 m /s = 0.25 kph

This is around the rim of the mouthpiece, where the velocity is the highest. Around the inside of the mouth itself the area is pi * r^2 = 0.07 m^2, which is higher so the velocity is lower. Outside of the lip the velocity is also lower. Water is coming in from all directions so the effective area crossing their paths is higher.

Q2. No idea. It depends how fine the particles are, and you'll have to look up some obscure handbook to find the equations. You're probably best off just trying and seeing. But with the low velocity from Q1, you probably won't get much suction at all. Best to lower the mouthpiece a bit and/or make it less wide. A friend of mine had a small aquarium with a small hose with about a meter of pressure (gravity powered) doing the sucking to pick up loose debris. That translates to a velocity of around 4.5 m/s (h = v^2 / 2g, g = 9.8 m/s), so maybe you could use that as a starting point. Just don't exceed a few meters of suction head (also = v^2 / 2g) or you'll get pump cavitation. Depending on suction shape the actual suction head is often half of this or less, but it'll help you ballpark it at least.

Q3. It would be the exact same size. The static head loss is equal to the water surface at the discharge minus the water surface at the suction, which are both the same regardless of the setup. That's assuming you're discharging back into the seabed somewhere else. If you're discharging 2 meters above the seabed into open air, then there's 2 meters you could save simply by running a hose to discharge under water. There's still no need to move the pump.

If it helps you conceptually, think of it this way: Being under 7 meters of water hurts as much at the discharge as it helps at the suction.

Btw, with only a meter or so of head (all from velocity in Q2), you don't need a very powerful pump regardless. 0.001 m^3/s (flow) * 9.8m^2/s (gravity) * 1m (head) * 1000kg/m^3 (water density)= 9.8 Watts. That's at 100% efficiency, actual pumps might be 40-80% efficient. The power will be more if the head is higher than 1 meter. A lot of pumps are rated at 3 meters or more, so you might not be able to find such a small / low pressure pump.
Bob S
#3
Apr21-09, 10:55 AM
P: 4,663
Hi Tor-
The previous answer is very comprehensive, I just want to add that there are some online flow and pressure drop calculators such as this one:
http://www.pipeflowcalculations.com/...drop/index.htm
The calculator indicates that the pressure drop in your 100 m hose is about 0.09 bar (0.09 atm) so there is no problem in the sucking limit of the pump. The Reynolds number in the hose is 1900, which is acceptable. Sounds like you are dredging for gold in the bottom of one of the rivers in California. The choice of mouthpiece will have to be determined by experimentation. You will need a certain minimum flow velocity to loosten the silt you are trying to pick up. Good luck.
Bob S

ericgrau
#4
Apr29-09, 11:23 AM
P: 20
Water Flow, Pump Effect

Ah, I didn't notice the 100m length, that'll add a little pressure loss. For some reason I thought it was a short hose. To convert back and forth between meters of water and other forms of pressure, just find the pressure of a column of water X meters high. For example, 1 meter high of water weighs 9800 N per square meter, which is 9800 Pa or 9.8 kPa or roughly 0.098 atm. So from Bob's calculation that's another meter of pressure for your pump, for 2 meters or about 0.2 atm (rounded) or about 20 kPa total assuming you use 1 meter of pressure for suction (> 4.5 m/s velocity, see my other post above).


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Effect of water flow on electrical resistance General Physics 1
Effect on Flow measuring device due to turbulent flow of air Mechanical Engineering 5
Flow problem with a two diemsional water flow divider Mechanical Engineering 0
Fluid flow pump help General Engineering 3
Water Pump Flow General Physics 1