| Thread Closed |
Limit Of A Function From Definition |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Oct20-09, 06:56 AM | #1 |
|
|
Limit Of A Function From Definition
I have to prove from the definiton of the limit of a function that the limit of f(x) as x tends to 2 equlas 3, given that;
f(x)=(2x-1) I know that I have to find an epsilon such that |f(x)-l| [tex]\leq[/tex] [tex]\epsilon[/tex] and delta such that 0 [tex]\leq[/tex] |x-a| [tex]\leq[/tex] [tex]\delta[/tex] Nowing putting in the conditions for this f(x); |2x-4| [tex]\leq[/tex] [tex]\epsilon[/tex] and 0 [tex]\leq[/tex] |x-2| [tex]\leq[/tex] [tex]\delta[/tex] But I don't where to go from here. Any help would be great! |
| Oct20-09, 07:06 AM | #2 |
|
|
Well, you have:
|2x-4|=2|x-2| Can this be made arbitrarily small (i.e, below some fixed "epsilon"), as long as we pick a small enough "delta"? In particular, IF we want [itex]2|x-2|\leq\epsilon[/itex], what is the largest value we can pick for "delta" in order to ENSURE the validity of the above inequality? |
| Oct20-09, 07:54 AM | #3 |
|
|
Often, we need to find [tex]\delta = \delta(\epsilon)[/tex] as a function of the [tex]\epsilon[/tex] we were given.
That is, write [tex]|f(x)-l|[/tex] as a function [tex]|x-a|[/tex] and use your delta to show that it is less than epsilon |
| Oct20-09, 12:43 PM | #4 |
|
|
Limit Of A Function From Definition
So I know that |f(x)-l|=2|(x-2)|=2|x-a|
Would it then be right to say that since |x-a|=|x-2| [tex]\leq[/tex] [tex]\delta[/tex] then |f(x)-l|=2|x-2| [tex]\leq[/tex] 2[tex]\delta[/tex] hence taking 2[tex]\delta[/tex] [tex]\leq[/tex] [tex]\frac{\epsilon}{2}[/tex] would satisfy the problem?? |
| Oct20-09, 01:04 PM | #5 |
|
|
![]() (you meant, I think delta<=epsilon/2, I think..) |
| Oct20-09, 01:25 PM | #6 |
|
|
Yeah that is what I meant! Woops. So is the following proof correct then;
Definition of the Limit of a Function at a Point. Suppose that f(x) is defined on (a-R,a)U(a,a+R), for some R [tex]\succ[/tex] 0. Then f(x) tends to l as x tends to a if, given any [tex]\epsilon[/tex] in R[tex]^{+}[/tex] , there exists [tex]\delta[/tex] in R[tex]^{+}[/tex] such that, |f(x)-l| [tex]\prec[/tex] [tex]\epsilon[/tex] whenever 0 [tex]\prec[/tex] |x-a| [tex]\prec[/tex] [tex]\delta[/tex] Now in this case f(x)=2x-1, l=3 and a=2 Hence |2x-4| [tex]\prec[/tex] [tex]\epsilon[/tex] Now 2|x-2| [tex]\prec[/tex] [tex]\epsilon[/tex] = |x-a|[tex]\prec[/tex] [tex]\delta[/tex] Hence taking [tex]\delta[/tex] [tex]\leq[/tex] [tex]\frac{\epsilon}{2}[/tex] Then |f(x)-l| [tex]\prec[/tex] [tex]\epsilon[/tex] whenever 0 [tex]\prec[/tex] |x-a| [tex]\prec[/tex] [tex]\delta[/tex] As required |
| Oct20-09, 01:41 PM | #7 |
|
|
Slightly scruffy-looking proof, but okay nonetheless!
|
| Oct20-09, 01:43 PM | #8 |
|
|
Thanks for the help!
|
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Limit Of A Function From Definition
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Help with epsilon-delta definition of a limit of a function | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 3 | ||
| The definition of limit | Calculus | 8 | ||
| Help with formal definition of the limit of a function | General Math | 9 | ||
| Definition of limit | Introductory Physics Homework | 2 | ||
| Use definition of limit... | Calculus | 4 | ||