Self contained U transit drive for spacecraft

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a proposed self-contained U transit drive for spacecraft, exploring its theoretical mechanics and addressing concerns about its feasibility. Participants engage in a technical examination of the drive's design, including combustion chambers and exhaust dynamics, while debating its implications for momentum and propulsion.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a U transit drive that utilizes two combustion chambers and exhaust nozzles to propel a spacecraft by directing fuel exhaust through a U-shaped tunnel, claiming that the design incorporates a new super element called superglass.
  • Another participant argues that the proposed system does not result in net forward momentum change, using an analogy of a bullet fired from a gun into a U-tube to illustrate their point.
  • A subsequent reply clarifies that the combustion chambers are oriented differently than suggested, asserting that the exhausts push the ship forward when they enter the curves of the U-tube.
  • Further responses emphasize that the initial claim of the design not being a perpetual motion machine does not negate the fundamental issues raised regarding momentum conservation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the feasibility of the proposed drive, with one side asserting its potential and the other challenging its validity based on principles of momentum conservation. No consensus is reached on the viability of the concept.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the mechanics of the proposed drive, particularly regarding the interaction of exhausts with the spacecraft and the implications for momentum. The discussion reflects unresolved technical challenges and assumptions about the nature of the proposed elements and their interactions.

Newtype
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
First of all this is not a perpetual motion machine. This type of transit drive works in theory by having two combustion chambers positioned parallel to the spacecraft 's width and perpendicular to its length. Each of the two exhaust nozzles are also positioned parallel to the spacecraft 's width and perpendicular to its length. Fuel is pumped into the combustion chambers and goes out the two exhaust nozzles at high velocity, and each fuel exhuast half next travels through a half of the U shaped tunnel until they both collide against the ship's midship bulkhead pushing the spacecraft forwards. The fuel is made up of multitudes of theorized systematic new elements in which each element provides an incremental acceleration when it combusts (each latter fuel element is more combustible than the former fuel element). The fuel exhausts don't exit the spacecraft . The structure of the U tunnel, combustion chambers, exhaust nozzles, etc. are made up of a theorized new super element I call superglass (the superglass structure negates the necessity of magnetic fields to contain the exhaust particles to keep them from melting spacecraft structure).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Doesn't work - no net forward momentum change.
Picture a simplified version, gun (pointing forward) fires bullet into a u tube which returns the bullet backwards to a catchers mit next to the gun.

1, Gun fires
The gun, and the ship it is attached to go backward. Bullet goes forward.
Ship receives one unit of backward momentum, bullet gets one unit equal forward momentum.

2, Bullet hits the curve in the u-tube
Bullet exchanges momentum with the tube and changes direction.
Bullet is now going backwards ship is going forward.
Since the bullet direction has changed sign, the ship gets two units of forward momentum the bullet has one backward unit.

3, Bullet caught and reused.
Bullet loses all it's momentum
Catches mit, and the ship it is attached to receive one one unit of backward momentum

4. Everything cancels out - and everything is now stationary in exactly the same place as before.

Note - if you left out the catchers mit and let the bullet go out the back - then the ship would have one unit of forward momentum, this would be exactly the same (ignoring losses) as just firing the gun out of the back.
 
1. You didn't completely read the first half of my paragraph. I said "two combustion chambers positioned parallel to the spacecraft 's width and perpendicular to its length". The combustion chambers aren't parallel to the ship's length and perpendicular to the ship's width. The fuel exhausts move sideways in relation to the ship's forward structure when they exit the combustion chambers & fuel exhausts.

2. No, when the exhausts enter the curves they press forward pushing the ship forward somewhat.

3. When exhausts hit midship bulkhead they push the ship forwards. (Try imagining an open box hit by a volleyball in space - the volleyball enters the box and pushes it forwards).
 
Last edited:
I was trying to simplify it so you could see where you fundemantally went wrong.

It's the problem with most perpetual motion machines - it's obvious in the simplest cases and then people add wheels-within-wheels or wheels at angles until they have confused themselves into believing it.
 
Again you failed to read that paragraph. I specifically typed "this is not a perpetual motion machine".
 
Last edited:
Newtype said:
Again you failed to read that paragraph. I specifically typed "this is not a perpetual motion machine".
Just because you claimed that this is not a perpetual motion machine does not make it so. This is a perpetual motion machine.

Thread closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
31K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
4K