Thread Closed

English Units Are Goofy

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Jun10-10, 06:44 PM   #1
 

English Units Are Goofy


A Jigger is three mouthfuls.

A hogshead is two barrels.

A furlong is "The distance a plow team could be driven without rest."

A mile is eight furlongs.

A league is "intended to be an hour's walk."

I'm not even going to get into the mess that is the definitions for weight....

English Units
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Ants and carnivorous plants conspire for mutualistic feeding
>> Forecast for Titan: Wild weather could be ahead
>> Researchers stitch defects into the world's thinnest semiconductor
Jun10-10, 06:48 PM   #2
 
That's why the entire world (except for Burma, Liberia and one other odd backward country) has switched to metric.
Jun10-10, 06:51 PM   #3
 
How is a quarter pound with cheese called in Europe?
Jun10-10, 06:55 PM   #4
 

English Units Are Goofy


Royaleeeeeee with Cheese

Jun10-10, 07:06 PM   #5
 
Quote by camdenreslink View Post
Royaleeeeeee with Cheese


Pulp Fiction
Jun10-10, 07:15 PM   #6
D H
 
Mentor
Quote by camdenreslink View Post
I'm not even going to get into the mess that is the definitions for weight....
What's wrong with weight? Legally and colloquially weight a measure of mass. Yes, things do get confusing when physicists try to get picky and claim that weight is a unit of force. And yes, the word 'pound' is a bit overloaded. A pound force makes a pound (mass) accelerate at one foot per second squared. At one point in time a (tower) pound of silver was worth one pound sterling (money). No problem. The mass of one pound of silver is obviously less than the mass of a pound of feathers. Avoirdupois pounds, troy pounds, tower pounds, merchant pounds, London pounds, pounds force, pound sterling, Manx pound, Jersey pound, ...; sure there are a lot of different pounds with different units, but aren't they are all rather obvious? Where exactly is this mess about with you are complaining?
Jun10-10, 07:28 PM   #7
 


You wouldn't say that's a mess?
Jun10-10, 07:30 PM   #8
D H
 
Mentor
Well, dang, you beat me to it. I was going to show that exact same crystal-clear diagram.
Jun10-10, 07:31 PM   #9
D H
 
Mentor
BTW, the diagram omits the distinction between a long ton and a short ton.
Jun10-10, 07:45 PM   #10
 
Blog Entries: 2
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
I definitely prefer to make all of my engineering calculations in SI due to the ease of unit handling and unambiguous nature. Be that as it may, I still can't help but "think" in inches, feet, pounds, and Fahrenheit.

... my company's engineering drawings are basically all in English (inches, feet, pounds) save for a small select few, and I can imagine what a nightmare it would be to try and "convert" all of those drawings to SI. I'm convinced the main reason the US hasn't "officially" converted to SI is because of the sheer number of companies (engineering, fabrication, assembly, etc.) that are dependent on a large database of English data/calculations/drawings.

Still, even in the US many companies do their work in SI exclusively, mainly driven by customer requirements. My opinion is that companies should strive to meet customer demands, not government regulation. If a company's customers require SI drawings and calcs, they will provide them. Simple as that.
Jun10-10, 09:17 PM   #11
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by Mech_Engineer View Post
Still, even in the US many companies do their work in SI exclusively
Except for the adult entertainment market !
Jun10-10, 10:10 PM   #12
 
7 "Avoirdupois" is equal to one "clove, nail" and 2 "clove, nail" is equal to one "Avoirdupois"?
Jun10-10, 10:15 PM   #13
 
Quote by mgb_phys View Post
Except for the adult entertainment market !
And whomever worked on that Mars lander around 11 years ago...
Jun10-10, 11:19 PM   #14
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Tell me about it. From my MG Midget

Jun12-10, 12:47 PM   #15
 
Quote by cesiumfrog View Post
That's why the entire world([URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_system"]except.... and one other odd backward country) has switched to metric.
If you mean the USA, the USA officially adopted metric units in 1866. However, being the USA, the government can't force people to use them.

http://lamar.colostate.edu/~hillger/...etric-act.html
Jun12-10, 07:25 PM   #16
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by D H View Post
What's wrong with weight? Legally and colloquially weight a measure of mass. Yes, things do get confusing when physicists try to get picky and claim that weight is a unit of force. And yes, the word 'pound' is a bit overloaded. A pound force makes a pound (mass) accelerate at one foot per second squared.
Not quite, Slick. One pound of force will make a pound of mass accelerate at 32.2 feet per second per second.

One needs to exert one poundal of force to accelerate one pound of mass at 1 foot per second per second.

And, of course, one poundal will accelerate one slug at 32 ft/s/s
Jun12-10, 07:36 PM   #17
 
Mentor
Quote by cesiumfrog View Post
That's why the entire world (except for Burma, Liberia and one other odd backward country) has switched to metric.
Canada hasn't switched to metric.
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: English Units Are Goofy
Thread Forum Replies
Goofy creationist theory Special & General Relativity 8
Goofy question for you guys General Physics 17
English System Units and R value Introductory Physics Homework 4
English vs. SI units of mass and weight General Physics 2
Maxwell related equations converted from MKSA units to Gaussian units Classical Physics 2