Mentor

## Forbidden Solution

 Quote by calebhoilday depicted often is a vertical line for an undefined gradient. The formula for that line is y=(infinity/0)x.
No it isn't. The formula for a vertical line is x = K, where K is some real number. The formula for a vertical line doesn't even involve y!
 Quote by calebhoilday When x is equal to any number besides zero it does not occupy that domain as y=(infinity/0) and is undefined, but when x=0 y=(0/0) and depicted is a vertical line, defining it as occupying all values. Does this mean that this high school depiction is false?
 Im aware that high school depictions can be mislead. I really just think that this whole thing is more or less a matter of opinion. To say a division problem, has to result in a single value, is more or less a rule someone has said. Show me the mathematical proof for this and ill back down from that statement. I think that the idea of 0/0= any value should be played with to see if it has any application, because this is just a matter of opinion.
 It's not a matter of opinion. An operation is defined in terms of functions, making it impossible for one input to produce multiple outputs. If you would like to define something differently, you can go ahead and do so, but you're probably not going to get very far.
 Recognitions: Homework Help Science Advisor The obvious definition caleb is herading toward is the preimage of [real] multiplication (here I'll use the symbol "/" for this, to remind you that it's division-inspired while not actually division), which is a "/" b = {a/b} for nonzero b, a "/" 0 = {} for nonzero a, and 0 "/" 0 = R, where R is the set of real numbers.
 CRGreathouse, I'm not sure that that's the definition caleb is heading towards. Saying that 0"/"0 = R is considerably different than saying 0/0 = any element of R.

Mentor
 Quote by calebhoilday Im aware that high school depictions can be mislead. I really just think that this whole thing is more or less a matter of opinion. To say a division problem, has to result in a single value, is more or less a rule someone has said. Show me the mathematical proof for this and ill back down from that statement. I think that the idea of 0/0= any value should be played with to see if it has any application, because this is just a matter of opinion.
How about addition? Is it a matter of opinion that the addition of two numbers should produce a single value? And multiplication? Is it also a matter of opinion that the product of two numbers should produce a single value? Division is an arithmetic operation the same as addition, subtraction, and multiplication, with the notable exception of not allowing division by zero, whether or not the dividend (the numerator) happens to be zero.

Arithmetic is so basic and has such a long history in humankind that there aren't a lot of books that present arithmetic at an axiomatic and theoretic level. The only one I'm aware of is Principia Mathematica, by Bertrand Russell and Alfred North Whitehead. I haven't read this, but I understand that they don't get around to proving that 1 + 1 = 2 until a ways into the second volume.

All four arithmetic operations that are defined produce a single value. The only arithmetic operation that is not defined is division by zero. Why would you want to make an exception for this particular operation and say that the result could be any number?

Recognitions:
Homework Help