Automotive Timing Belt


by robs314
Tags: automotive, design, timing belt
robs314
robs314 is offline
#1
Apr9-11, 10:26 AM
P: 16
I am choosing a timing belt for a 60kw continuous system at roughly 1100rpm. This is a relatively low speed application.
After using the belt selection programs written by Gates, Emerson and Goodyear, they all seem to point towards quite hefty installations with large pulley diameters and widths.

However, automotive belts must be able to transfer powers of this sort of magnitude, yet the pulleys used in these applications are much smaller.

I have found it very hard to find engineering manuals/specs for automotive belts. It seems only possible to search by car model type.

Does anyone know of any sources of automotive belt specs and manuals for the purpose of design?

Many thanks
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Review: With Galaxy S5, Samsung proves less can be more
Making graphene in your kitchen
Study casts doubt on climate benefit of biofuels from corn residue
Averagesupernova
Averagesupernova is offline
#2
Apr9-11, 12:49 PM
P: 2,452
I seriously doubt it takes 60 kw to turn over a camshaft. So I would say it's not apples to apples.
robs314
robs314 is offline
#3
Apr9-11, 01:44 PM
P: 16
My application is not an automotive one. The motor that needs a belt really does develop 60Kw, which I accept is quite large.

AlephZero
AlephZero is offline
#4
Apr9-11, 05:00 PM
Engineering
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 6,356

Automotive Timing Belt


Apart from the mismatch of power requirements, many production automobile belts are wimpy designs that are "throw away" replacement items. (On the last GM car I owned, the original 80,000m design life had been reduced to 40,000m, by which time not only was the belt just about shredded but the cheap plastic tensioning pulley was usually cracked as well. (Silly me for buying an American-designed engine, I guess).

40,000 miles is only about 1000 hours life. That's not much if you need something that runs continuously..

Also, power = force x velocity, so if you want high power at low RPM that will mean a bigger belt to take the bigger force, or large pulleys to increase the belt speed.
robs314
robs314 is offline
#5
Apr9-11, 05:21 PM
P: 16
Many thanks for your replies

I had a suspicion that it was down to longetivity more than anything else. However, my application only needs to be operational for less time than a car's engine, so would it be wiser for me to go down the automotive route?
If it were a blower, or compressor or something running all day, I wouldn't hesitate with a larger spec.

Thanks
mender
mender is offline
#6
Apr10-11, 01:45 AM
P: 563
You're asking the belt to withstand almost 400 ft.lbs of torque. If you have a 4 inch pulley, that's almost 1200 lb of force acting to pull the belt apart. That's pretty serious.

How big a belt would you need to lift the front end of the average small car? The typical timing belt might survive but the teeth wouldn't.

Call the tech line at Gates and listen to the tech adviser.
robs314
robs314 is offline
#7
Apr10-11, 04:12 AM
P: 16
It has put my mind at rest that I was following the right approach to start with. I just thought automotive belts should be worth looking at, that's all.

Your advice has meant that I will not have to spend any more time looking for automotive belting data.

I'm very grateful, thank you :)


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Using a timing belt for a Dynamometer Mechanical Engineering 0
job application timing Career Guidance 0
[Theory of Machines] Why is Belt in a Belt drive a Link... Engineering Systems & Design 5
timing diagram Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 4