Register to reply 
Traveling at Light Speed Through Space: A Thought Experiment 
Share this thread: 
#1
Apr2911, 09:27 PM

P: 122

My brotherinlaw proposed the following thought experiment: Suppose a person was sitting on the nose of a spaceship traveling at the speed of light through outer space. Now suppose that person pushed off against the spaceship launching himself ahead of it. Is it the case that that person will maintain his speed at the speed of light, since both the spaceship and the person is traveling through a vacuum and neither experience wind resistance? Also, is it true that the person will forever drift in space since nothing can travel faster than the speed of light?
Thank you for sharing your insight, M 


#2
Apr2911, 11:17 PM

HW Helper
P: 3,440

Imagine Tim sitting on earth watching this spaceship with Tom on it. The spaceship could accelerate to get close to, but not exactly the speed of light. As viewed by Tim, Tom could increase his speed slightly by pushing off from his spaceship, but no matter how hard Tom pushed off, he would still be travelling less than the speed of light as viewed by Tim. If Tom then floats through space at close to the speed of light (as viewed by Tim), then it would take a lot of work, but it is always possible for Tim to catch up to Tom.



#3
Apr2911, 11:26 PM

P: 15,319

But let's say for the sake of argument it's going .999c. Relativistic velocities don't add this way. They add using this formula: v(final) = (v1 + v2) / (1+ (v1+v2/c^2)) You will find that, when you add the ship's v (v1) and the person's jump (v2), it will always result in a number less than c. Even if you had a 2nd stage rocket blast off from the first stage at .999c, the final v of the second stage will still be less than c (0.9999994994997501c in fact). 


#4
Apr3011, 04:43 AM

Mentor
P: 5,403

Traveling at Light Speed Through Space: A Thought Experiment
Vacuum isn't perfect, IIRC there are approximately 2 atoms per square metre in space (this of course changes). Over time this resistance will slow the person. Though I doubt they could ever be slowed to standing still in the lifetime of the universe 


#5
Apr3011, 01:51 PM

P: 122

Thanks everyone for your response. I'm an amateur in physics so could someone explain why it is not theoretically possible for a spaceship to travel at the speed of light? Does it have something to do with Einstein's E=mc^2?
Also, does ".99c" stand for ".99 percent of the speed of light"? Thank you, M 


#6
Apr3011, 02:15 PM

Mentor
P: 11,615




#7
Apr3011, 02:54 PM

Mentor
P: 5,403

I.e. at .9c the energy required to accelerate to .91c is more than to accelerate from .1c to .11c It requires infinite energy to accelerate matter with mass to light speed. p.s If you could travel at faster than light velocities then you would have invented time travel! 


#8
Apr3011, 03:30 PM

HW Helper
P: 3,440

[tex] \displaystyle{P = \frac{mv}{\sqrt{1\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}} [/tex]
This is the momentum of an object in special relativity, where m is the rest mass of the object. When the velocity tends to the speed of light, the momentum tends to infinity. To give an object infinite momentum requires infinite energy, which is why the object can't ever get to the speed of light. Also interesting, is that when the velocity is much less than the speed of light, the bit in the square root is almost equal to one, so the equation becomes P=mv, which is just the classical equation for momentum 


#9
May111, 01:51 PM

P: 103

it seems it us the opinion of most that a mass cannot exceed the speed of light. we also thought the speed of sound wash a limitation. i feel the speed of light can be achieved and exceeded. if true then a lot of funny stuff would be noted. for instancence if money head where ahead of their feet in the path of travel (at C) then he would see his feet frozen in time. but if accelerated past C, then he would see his feet moving as if someone hit the rwind button... if C could be exceeded.



#10
May111, 01:59 PM

P: 267




#11
May111, 02:05 PM

P: 3,387




#12
May111, 04:04 PM

HW Helper
P: 3,440

If someone could accelerate past c, then all of Einstein's relativity would be wrong. Einstein's relativity is probably the most well established theory that has ever existed.
If someday, someone was accelerated past c, then I would have to concede that Einstein's relativity is incorrect. Until that day, we can assume Einstein's relativity is correct. 


#13
May111, 10:48 PM

P: 15,319

It is not the same as the 'sound barrier' myth. 


#14
May211, 04:11 AM

HW Helper
P: 3,440

The point that I'm trying to make is that no theory is absolutely certain.
Theory must fit experimental observations, and the results of future experiments cannot be assumed. This is the foundation of all science, in my opinion. 


#15
May211, 04:19 AM

P: 605




#16
May211, 04:52 AM

P: 3,387

(Or some old aircraft that done it in a nose dive?) 


#17
May211, 05:11 AM

Mentor
P: 5,403

It's not that we have a "pretty good idea" that mass cannot travel at light speed, we have evidence to show it is not possible. This is not a case of "we don't know but perhaps we will find a way in the future", it is a case of "evidence shows us it is not possible"/. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
A thought experiment for surpassing the speed of light  Special & General Relativity  7  
Light speed thought experiment please help  Special & General Relativity  10  
Speed of Light Thought Experiment  General Physics  5  
Thought Experiment  Measuring speed of light  Special & General Relativity  11  
'Speed of Light' Thought Experiment  Special & General Relativity  32 