Medical xray calculater


by Nidal
Tags: calculater, medical, xray
Nidal
Nidal is offline
#1
May14-11, 12:51 AM
P: 4
Is there a radiation physicist can help me calculate my xray medical tests by msv ?

Thank u
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
NASA's space station Robonaut finally getting legs
Free the seed: OSSI nurtures growing plants without patent barriers
Going nuts? Turkey looks to pistachios to heat new eco-city
Drakkith
Drakkith is online now
#2
May16-11, 10:27 PM
PF Gold
Drakkith's Avatar
P: 11,040
Do you know any info about the x-ray device? How much it emits or anything? Also, what kind of X-ray did you get and to what location?
Lambert
Lambert is offline
#3
May17-11, 12:01 AM
P: 21
I am not a physicist but this seems close to what you are looking for

http://www.xrayrisk.com/calculator/calculator.php

Nidal
Nidal is offline
#4
May17-11, 12:09 AM
P: 4

Medical xray calculater


Hi, its for my child 2 years & 3 months.
General Electric Device, In Emergency Section, 3 Lung Xray, ( Digital ).
After Amonth, Same Room, 3 Knees Xray, ( Digital ).
After aweak, asmaller device in children section, i think its general electric also, digital, 6 pelvis included knees Xrays, no protection to stomach or penis, but when i opened the cd, the first 2 tests in emergency section was more clear photos than the third.

12 tests in 42 days.
Lambert
Lambert is offline
#5
May17-11, 12:28 AM
P: 21
the clearer the photos the higher the kvp... seems like some serious dose rates, most lead shields are .5mm lead, I would use a few of them if it were me under the primary beam.
Drakkith
Drakkith is online now
#6
May17-11, 01:39 AM
PF Gold
Drakkith's Avatar
P: 11,040
I don't know the average power of x-ray machines, so I cannot make a guess. Perhaps someone else does?
Danuta
Danuta is offline
#7
May17-11, 08:19 AM
P: 100
Quote Quote by Lambert View Post
I am not a physicist but this seems close to what you are looking for

http://www.xrayrisk.com/calculator/calculator.php
This calculator is for film x-rays. OP states "digital" where dosage should be much less.
Dmytry
Dmytry is offline
#8
May17-11, 09:49 AM
P: 505
One of the weirdest things with medical x-ray is that usually none of the doctors or technicians got a slightest clue what the dose is. That kind of boggles my mind.
Then, as consequence, such stuff happens:
http://www.auntminnie.com/index.asp?...s&ItemID=83566
"the technologist took 151 CT scans in a 65-minute period", resulting in radiation burn.
It is not an uncommon occurrence. This sort of injury is directly caused by viewing effects of radiation as 'negligible'.

You can probably find the dose from the operational manual of the exact device in question. If technicians do not know it[the exact dose], they did not RTFM properly.
Danuta
Danuta is offline
#9
May17-11, 12:42 PM
P: 100
Yeah, you need to know the digital x-ray device and also the type of electronic sensor to calculate dose. Normally, the dose should be less than with using film x-ray but wrong length of exposure(as in they did not RTFM properly) and/or excessive frequency(since dose is reduced they think nothing of taking more x-rays than really needed) sometimes ends up giving the recipient more exposure than less.
Drakkith
Drakkith is online now
#10
May17-11, 06:03 PM
PF Gold
Drakkith's Avatar
P: 11,040
Quote Quote by Dmytry View Post
One of the weirdest things with medical x-ray is that usually none of the doctors or technicians got a slightest clue what the dose is. That kind of boggles my mind.
Then, as consequence, such stuff happens:
http://www.auntminnie.com/index.asp?...s&ItemID=83566
"the technologist took 151 CT scans in a 65-minute period", resulting in radiation burn.
It is not an uncommon occurrence. This sort of injury is directly caused by viewing effects of radiation as 'negligible'.

You can probably find the dose from the operational manual of the exact device in question. If technicians do not know it[the exact dose], they did not RTFM properly.
I could definitely see some additional training or emphasis placed on training technicians. That is, if they don't already receive training for it.
Lambert
Lambert is offline
#11
May18-11, 09:59 AM
P: 21
The problem IMO arises as the techs/staff have little knowledge about the dangers of ionizing radiation, One tech told me once that shes safe as long as she is 5 feet away from the tube. I thought she was joking but she was serious, I asked her if she wanted me to take the lead and lead glass window out of the control screen since its not needed. It would be a real eye opener if the techs were given the use of the radiation safety officers meters to see what type of scatter is emitted from not only the patient but the tube itself. the cumulative dose during a yearly workload is something no tech has ever mention in my presence.
Lambert
Lambert is offline
#12
May20-11, 09:19 AM
P: 21
http://www.naturalnews.com/030920_ra..._children.html
Lambert
Lambert is offline
#13
Jun4-11, 03:34 AM
P: 21
Quote Quote by Danuta View Post
This calculator is for film x-rays. OP states "digital" where dosage should be much less.
Can you or anyone kindly produce the difference in dose or even kvp or msv towards digital and film type radiation exposure. dosage much less? not even close IMHO

ty


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Xray - what physics discipline? General Physics 0
power of your calculater Introductory Physics Homework 2
Xray reflection Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 0
XRAY - Mosley Question High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 5
why does my calculater calculate this wrong? Precalculus Mathematics Homework 3