Sadness! No Use for Beautiful Illustration - Sadness!

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of lifting another person by their neck at arm's length, inspired by depictions in movies. Participants explore the dynamics of strength, balance, and the physical limitations involved in such actions, with references to illustrations and personal anecdotes.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that a strong person could lift another by the neck if they possess sufficient strength, referencing fictional characters like the Terminator.
  • Others contend that such lifts cannot occur as depicted in movies without the lifter adjusting their weight and stance, emphasizing the importance of balance and center of mass.
  • A participant suggests that the illustration exaggerates the necessary leaning of the lifter, proposing that the relative sizes of the individuals involved significantly affect the dynamics.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of dynamics versus statics, arguing that lifting someone off the ground and holding them requires different considerations than simply lifting and placing them.
  • Some participants share personal anecdotes related to lifting and physical interactions, adding a humorous tone to the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanics of lifting another person by the neck, with no consensus reached on the feasibility of such actions as portrayed in films. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the accuracy of the illustrations and the underlying physics.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the problem, noting that assumptions about strength, size, and balance play crucial roles in the discussion. The conversation also touches on the difference between dynamic and static scenarios without resolving these distinctions.

DaveC426913
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
24,551
Reaction score
8,866
Well boo. Thread got erased out from under me.

Now I have no use for my beautiful illo.
 

Attachments

  • PF_20110525_terminator.png
    PF_20110525_terminator.png
    9.4 KB · Views: 549
Physics news on Phys.org
Art is in the eye of the beholder.
 
I'm afraid to ask what the tall shadow-guy is actually doing to the short shadow-guy.
 
Somethings wrong with you Dave. Why would you draw such terrifying art.
 
I am sorry Dave, I am afraid you can't post that.
 
What is it?

What does it depict?

EDIT: Oh, I see. The short guy is "in the air". You really should draw a floor in there somewhere.
 
For a brief few minutes a thread was posted last night, asking if a strong enough person could actually lift another person by their neck at arm's length.

One argument was that, if the guy was strong enough (a la Terminator) there's no reason it couldn't be done.

My argument was, even if they were strong enough, it couldn't happen the way it does in movies. No matter how string the lifter, they cannot do it without shifting their weight so as to put their feet directly below the centre of mass. They'd have to lean back significantly, or they'd have to put one foot out between the other guy's legs. And you never see them do this.
 
DaveC426913 said:
For a brief few minutes a thread was posted last night, asking if a strong enough person could actually lift another person by their neck at arm's length.

One argument was that, if the guy was strong enough (a la Terminator) there's no reason it couldn't be done.

My argument was, even if they were strong enough, it couldn't happen the way it does in movies. No matter how string the lifter, they cannot do it without shifting their weight so as to put their feet directly below the centre of mass. They'd have to lean back significantly, or they'd have to put one foot out between the other guy's legs. And you never see them do this.

Oh well then. Your illustration more than clearly demonstrates that. :rolleyes:



:biggrin:
 
i think it depends heavily on the relative size of the two. and the length of the feet.
 
  • #10
I guess Jaws doesn't lift James Bond that high after all:
jawsCustom.jpg


Oh well... I'm just glad he finds love:
worst-james-bond-movies-jaws-in-love.jpg
 
  • #11
DaveC426913 said:
My argument was, even if they were strong enough, it couldn't happen the way it does in movies. No matter how string the lifter, they cannot do it without shifting their weight so as to put their feet directly below the centre of mass. They'd have to lean back significantly, or they'd have to put one foot out between the other guy's legs. And you never see them do this.

True, but I think your drawing exaggerates the amount of leaning the big person has to do.

If the big guy is a sumo wrestler (265 kg) and he's holding Twiggy by the neck (40 kg), then the combined center of mass is only about 10 cm away from the sumo wrestler's center of mass. Assuming the sumo wrestler has an average shoulder height of about 1.4 m, then the sumo wrestler only has to lean back at about a 4 degree angle.

Of course, using a sumo wrestler and Twiggy probably exaggerates the situation as badly as your drawings do, but it also ignores the fact that the big guy's center of mass will be very close to being above his heels, allowing him to counter at least some of the torque of an off-centered center of mass with his feet. If the center of mass has to raise up for the sumo wrestler's body to rotate, then he can maintain his balance, so the combined center of mass doesn't have to be directly above the front of his heels.

I guess Jaws doesn't lift James Bond that high after all:

Notice how the big guy's butt settles backward just a bit though. His legs aren't straight.
 
  • #12
physics girl phd said:
I guess Jaws doesn't lift James Bond that high after all:
jawsCustom.jpg

The longer I look at the picture, the more I think James loves Jaws.

But perhaps that's just a light play.
 
  • #13
DaveC426913 said:
For a brief few minutes a thread was posted last night, asking if a strong enough person could actually lift another person by their neck at arm's length.

One argument was that, if the guy was strong enough (a la Terminator) there's no reason it couldn't be done.

My argument was, even if they were strong enough, it couldn't happen the way it does in movies. No matter how string the lifter, they cannot do it without shifting their weight so as to put their feet directly below the centre of mass.

You are forgetting the fact that this is a problem about dynamics not statics, unless the lifter is wants to hold the liftee in mid air for a long time.

I saw this done "live" years ago, when I was an intern. There was another intern who was a 5 foot tall wimp, and we had a 300 lb gorilla of a supervisor who was a stickler for things being "done right". The wimp had committed some heinous crime like punching some computer cards using the wrong colored cards. The supervisor got frustrated trying to shout at somebody who was 18 inches shorter than he was, so he got hold of the wimp's shoulder blades from above, picked him off the floor, and sat him on top of a 4-drawer filing cabinet so he could look him straight in the eye and shout at the same time.

Political correctness has taken all the fun out of working in industry these days :smile:
 
  • #14
AlephZero said:
You are forgetting the fact that this is a problem about dynamics not statics, unless the lifter is wants to hold the liftee in mid air for a long time.

You're talking about a completely different scenario. There's no question that a very strong person can pick up another person and put them on a shelf.

I'm talking about when they literally lift them straight off their feet and hold them there, toes dangling, thus:
[PLAIN]http://media.offbeatmama.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/2/files/2011/04/darthvaderchoking.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #15
BobG said:
True, but I think your drawing exaggerates the amount of leaning the big person has to do.
Of course it does.That' s the point of illustrating a concept.


BobG said:
Notice how the big guy's butt settles backward just a bit though. His legs aren't straight.

Notice how it's a Hollywood stunt. My money's on an orange crate under Moore's feet.
 
  • #16
physics girl phd said:
I guess Jaws doesn't lift James Bond that high after all:
jawsCustom.jpg


Oh well... I'm just glad he finds love:
worst-james-bond-movies-jaws-in-love.jpg

My oldest brother had dinner with Richard Kiel once. He's a Bond nut.
 
  • #17
Newai said:
My oldest brother had dinner with Richard Kiel once. He's a Bond nut.

And what did Richard have? The aircraft cable pasta? :biggrin:
 
  • #18
DaveC426913 said:
And what did Richard have? The aircraft cable pasta? :biggrin:

I remember that! Actually, all I heard was that Kiel likes to talk. He really likes to talk.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
7K
  • · Replies 91 ·
4
Replies
91
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K