## Digging a Well (Work Problem)

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

A well is dug in the shape of a rectangular prism. It is 30ft deep and has a base with area of 40ft^2. Assuming that the soil weighs 150 lbs/ft^3, calculate the work W required to raise the soil to ground level.

2. Relevant equations

W = ∫dW
dW = ρ(area)(distance)dx

3. The attempt at a solution

I had dW = ρ40(30-x)dx

Then I said W = 150∫[from 0 to 30] 1200-40x dx

Solved to get 2700000ft/lb, which is wrong. I don't really understand what I did wrong here. Isn't this just like pumping water out of a tank or something?
 PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com >> Galaxies fed by funnels of fuel>> The better to see you with: Scientists build record-setting metamaterial flat lens>> Google eyes emerging markets networks
 Recognitions: Gold Member Homework Help I get the same answer. I guess we are both assuming "rectangular prism" means the same thing as "rectangular parallelepiped" or "rectangular box".

Recognitions:
Homework Help
 Quote by Sarangalex 1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data A well is dug in the shape of a rectangular prism. It is 30ft deep and has a base with area of 40ft^2. Assuming that the soil weighs 150 lbs/ft^3, calculate the work W required to raise the soil to ground level. 2. Relevant equations W = ∫dW dW = ρ(area)(distance)dx 3. The attempt at a solution I had dW = ρ40(30-x)dx Then I said W = 150∫[from 0 to 30] 1200-40x dx Solved to get 2700000ft/lb, which is wrong. I don't really understand what I did wrong here. Isn't this just like pumping water out of a tank or something?

I think your answer is too large by a factor of 30. Go back to your dW formula to see why.

RGV

## Digging a Well (Work Problem)

I don't understand why it would just be x for the distance rather than 30-x. Could someone explain this to me?
 Recognitions: Gold Member Homework Help It doesn't matter whether you use x or 30 - x. I think you are correct and I am puzzled what RGV sees that we don't, since his answers are usually spot on.
 But x and 30-x give you totally different answers...

Recognitions:
Gold Member
Homework Help
 Quote by Sarangalex But x and 30-x give you totally different answers...
No they don't.

Recognitions:
Homework Help
 Quote by LCKurtz It doesn't matter whether you use x or 30 - x. I think you are correct and I am puzzled what RGV sees that we don't, since his answers are usually spot on.
The cross-sectional area at depth x is 40 at x = 0, but the formula given by the OP gives 40*30. I think the correct formula should be dW = ρ*40*(30-x)/30 dx.

RGV

Recognitions:
Gold Member
Homework Help
 Quote by Ray Vickson The cross-sectional area at depth x is 40 at x = 0, but the formula given by the OP gives 40*30. I think the correct formula should be dW = ρ*40*(30-x)/30 dx. RGV
But the OP has just chosen his coordinates measuring depth from the other end; that's the 30-x, which varies from 30 to 0. You could measure from the other end and use x as I mentioned earlier. The cross section is a constant 40.

We are both thinking of a hole shaped by a rectangular box, right?
 Oh, I'm sorry. I see they are the same now, I just don't understand how.

Recognitions:
Gold Member
Homework Help
 Quote by Sarangalex Oh, I'm sorry. I see they are the same now, I just don't understand how.
It is just a matter of which end you put your coordinate system and whether x is measured
positive up or down.
 Recognitions: Homework Help No, I was thinking of a wedge-shaped excavation (because of the word "prism" in the original post). In that case I would be wrong anyway, because (my) dW is weight, not work. For a wedge-shaped hole the answer would be Work = int rho * 40 * x*(1 - x/30) dx = 900000 ft-lb. RGV

 Tags calculus, work
 Thread Tools

 Similar Threads for: Digging a Well (Work Problem) Thread Forum Replies Introductory Physics Homework 3 Earth 29 Introductory Physics Homework 9 Brain Teasers 10 Biology 0