Suppose I had a hypothetical blog entry which I deemed a "personal theory."

PF welcomes you to take advantage of its blog feature. We recognize that blog entries are inherently personal; accordingly, more flexibility is permitted there than would be suitable in the main forums. Nonetheless, blog entries are subject to the same overall guidelines in effect throughout PF, as appropriate. Personal theories are not permitted in blogs. Obscenity, hate speeches, religious screeds, personal attacks on other members, and promotion of crackpottery are not welcome anywhere on PF. Be aware that "Private" blog entries are viewable by Mentors and Admin.

One of the main goals of PF is to help students learn the current status of physics as practiced by the scientific community; accordingly, Physicsforums.com strives to maintain high standards of academic integrity. There are many open questions in physics, and we welcome discussion on those subjects provided the discussion remains intellectually sound. It is against our Posting Guidelines to discuss, in the PF forums or in blogs, new or non-mainstream theories or ideas that have not been published in professional peer-reviewed journals or are not part of current professional mainstream scientific discussion. Non-mainstream or personal theories will be deleted. Unfounded challenges of mainstream science and overt crackpottery will not be tolerated anywhere on the site. Linking to obviously "crank" or "crackpot" sites is prohibited.

What you have is a personal opinion,
not a personal theory.

You could check how plausible your opinion is using accepted
scientific theories, if you had enough knowledge and enough
computing power to run the simulations.

From the PF rules (emphasis mine)

Again from the rules (emphasis mine)

I wouldn't advise being cocky using technicalities to post something which disagrees with the science behind it.

As long as the science agrees with it, then there shouldn't be a problem.

this whole site and its extensive list of rules forces users to be very discriminating with their ideas and terms, lest they upset the status quo of what users, mentors, and admin deem to their liking.

The site forces people to adhere to scientific standards. Period.

I'm always amused that people come here, decide they don't like it and then complain over and over or try to work around the rules rather than just going elsewhere. Private site, private rules. If you don't like it, tough.

[itex]And I am always amused by hypocrital veteran users
who violate their own rules by attacking users with sarcasm
or uses of words such as "prattling" to squash polite, relevant
discussion, lest it hurt their egos.

The fact that this is a private site is irrelevant to all the users being
held accountable to not disparaging other users by violating the rules.

...in mind is that if you lack the knowledge to distinguish whether or not your idea,
opinion or theory is in line with mainstream science then it you probably
lack the knowledge to make a good theory.

A personal blog defeats its purpose if user has to call into question
every minute detail as to whether or not they adhered to using
scientific methods every time. I can really try to do that.

A personal blog defeats its purpose if user has to call into question
every minute detail as to whether or not they adhered to using
scientific methods every time. I can really try to do that.

I just read the post of Ryan m b to not discuss this anymore.

I was not saying that we cannot discuss this anymore, I was saying that if you have a problem with the posts of other users then report them but we will not discuss them openly.