| New Reply |
Some Radiological Dating with Stoichiometry |
Share Thread |
| Feb27-12, 09:20 AM | #1 |
|
|
Some Radiological Dating with Stoichiometry
It's kind of baffling me when I'm encountering this question in this sub-chapter. It's just unusual. So I really need your help :D
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data If a rock sample was found to contain 1.16 × 10-7 mol of argon-40, how much potassium-40 (t1/2 = 1.3 × 109 yr) would also have to be present for the rock to be 1.3 × 109 years old? See assumption in Problem 14.84. And the problem 14.84 question is ... A 500 mg sample of rock was found to have 2.45 × 10-6 mol of potassium-40 (t1/2 = 1.3 × 109 yr) and 2.45 × 10-6 mol of argon-40. How old was the rock? (Hint: What assumption is made about the origin of the argon- 40?) 2. Relevant equations k = In 2/t1/2 3. The attempt at a solution I just find out that the both K and Ar in periodic table have a closely enough molecular mass, which is 40 g/mol (39,1 for K and 39,95 for Ar). But it just weird when the molecular mass is multiplied with each moles of Ar and K to find mass, because it doesn't add up for 500 mg. Also I don't have any idea what does the t1/2 works for. Of course we could find the rate constant from the equation before for it. |
| Feb27-12, 09:42 AM | #2 |
|
|
What happens if you assume all the argon-40 originates from the potassium-40 beta minus decay? How much potassium had to be present in the rock for that much to decay?
|
| Feb27-12, 10:14 AM | #3 |
|
|
|
| Feb27-12, 10:55 AM | #4 |
|
Admin
|
Some Radiological Dating with Stoichiometry
Potassium and argon are only a small part of the sample, so their masses don't have to add to 500 mg.
|
| Feb29-12, 04:01 AM | #5 |
|
|
|
| New Reply |
Similar discussions for: Some Radiological Dating with Stoichiometry
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| dating sites are they real or a joke someone fill me in | Relationships | 9 | ||
| radiological physics question... please help | Advanced Physics Homework | 0 | ||
| Radiological disaster averted? | Nuclear Engineering | 0 | ||
| DHS radiological cleanup: 10rem/year for general public? | Current Events | 5 | ||