| New Reply |
glueing together normal topological spaces at a closed subset |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Mar8-12, 01:03 PM | #1 |
|
|
glueing together normal topological spaces at a closed subset
Hi all!
My question is the following. Suppose we have two normal topological spaces X and Y and we have a continuous map from a closed subset A of X to Y. Then we can construct another topological space by "glueing together" X and Y at A and f(A). By taking the quotient space of the disjoint union of X and Y by the equivalence relation that x is equivalent to y if: 1) x=y 2) x,y are elements of A and f(x)=f(y) or 3) x is an element of A and y is an element of Y and f(x)=y or x is an element of Y and y is an element of A and x=f(y). My question is how can you prove that this constructed space is again normal? |
| Mar8-12, 10:16 PM | #2 |
|
Recognitions:
|
The space obtained from this construction is called an adjunction space and is typically denoted by ##X \cup_f Y##. It forms a pushout in the category of topological spaces. With this and the normality of X and Y in mind, it's not too difficult to show that you can separate closed sets in ##X \cup_f Y## by a continuous function.
|
| Mar9-12, 11:27 AM | #3 |
|
|
Okay I believe this, but I would rather find a way to prove it without using any abstract non-sense so that I have an idea of where it is coming from.
So basically the question is if I have non-intersecting closed sets in this adjunction I look at the pre-image in the disjoint union of X and Y (where they are again closed and non-intersecting). Since I know X and Y are normal I can construct open sets now in both X and Y that don't intersect and contain the earlier closed sets (i.e. definition of normal). but how then do I make sure that when I project them onto the adjunction they are again open and non-intersecting? |
| Mar9-12, 05:07 PM | #4 |
|
Recognitions:
|
glueing together normal topological spaces at a closed subset
The abstract nonsense here is just a reformulation of what it means to give a space the quotient topology, so it's really not so abstract.
It's probably best not to try to separate by open sets, but to separate with continuous functions, like I mentioned in my post. This is where the abstract nonsense (which again is not so abstract) will be helpful. |
| Mar11-12, 07:28 AM | #5 |
|
|
aaah thank you!
Suddenly it all makes sense thanks! |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: glueing together normal topological spaces at a closed subset
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Measurable spaces vs. topological spaces | Calculus | 5 | ||
| Closed continuous surjective map and normal spaces | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 14 | ||
| Prove that countable intersections of closed subset of R^d are closed | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 2 | ||
| Topological Spaces... | Calculus | 1 | ||