
#1
Mar2912, 07:02 PM

P: 110

Let [itex]\mathcal{S} = \{S_{i}:i \in \mathbb{R} \} [/itex] where [itex]S_{i}[/itex] is a set. Then [itex]\mathcal{S}[/itex] is a set? Or, can this notation make sense in some way?




#2
Mar3012, 10:18 AM

P: 606

I can't see why you think S couldn't be a set, as long as each [itex] S_i[/itex] is...What did you have in mind? DonAntonio 



#3
Mar3012, 10:20 AM

P: 642

A set can be of anything. Even {Lincoln, Charizard, {Fish Fingers, Custard}} is a set. Your set is, therefore, valid. Note that its cardinality is one of the alephs, I don't know which one.




#4
Mar3012, 10:48 AM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 16,101

The class indexed by real numbers is a set? 



#5
Mar3012, 10:53 AM

P: 642





#6
Mar3012, 11:06 AM

P: 799

[itex]\mathcal{S} = \{S_{\alpha}:\alpha \in \mathbb{R} \} [/itex] which provides readers with an indication that we are indexing over a set other than the natural numbers. 



#7
Mar3012, 08:39 PM

P: 110





#8
Mar3012, 10:42 PM

P: 606

I see. But, as already noted by others, it is possible to index by means of any set, no matter its cardinality. In ZFC we can even use Zermelo's Well Ordering Theorem to well order ℝ and then wellorder the so indexed sets, if so wanted... DonAntonio 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Real Numbers vs Extended Real Numbers  Linear & Abstract Algebra  5  
air is a real substance for year 8 class  Introductory Physics Homework  2  
A new set of numbers as a zAxis to imaginary and real numbers?  General Math  9  
Complex numbers representing Real numbers  General Math  3  
Line of real numberstranscendental numbers  General Math  11 