Register to reply

Does macroscopic magnetic monopole contradict physics?

by liumylife
Tags: magnetic, monopole
Share this thread:
liumylife
#1
Apr15-12, 07:55 AM
P: 11
I know Dirac had said yes to existence of microscopic monopole by quantum theory, so why not the macroscopic monopole?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Physicists discuss quantum pigeonhole principle
First in-situ images of void collapse in explosives
The first supercomputer simulations of 'spin?orbit' forces between neutrons and protons in an atomic nucleus
vanhees71
#2
Apr15-12, 10:12 AM
Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 2,335
Indeed, there's no principle against the existence of magnetic monopoles. In this sense it's a mystery, why there are no elementary magnetic charges in nature.

However, not long ago, one has found a funny material, which behaves like a socalled "spin ice". In this substance one has found collective excitations (quasiparticles) which behaves like magnetic monopoles. There are a lot of such examples in condensed matter physics!
liumylife
#3
Apr17-12, 11:43 PM
P: 11
OK, since the quasipartical behaves like monopole, dose it produce magnetic field? Does moving "spin ice" produce EMR?


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Magnetic Monopole? General Physics 11
Magnetic monopole Introductory Physics Homework 0
Is there a magnetic field inside the 't Hooft-Polyakov magnetic monopole? Beyond the Standard Model 0
Magnetic monopole Advanced Physics Homework 3
Magnetic Monopole Classical Physics 13