Register to reply

Does macroscopic magnetic monopole contradict physics?

by liumylife
Tags: magnetic, monopole
Share this thread:
liumylife
#1
Apr15-12, 07:55 AM
P: 11
I know Dirac had said yes to existence of microscopic monopole by quantum theory, so why not the macroscopic monopole?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Symphony of nanoplasmonic and optical resonators produces laser-like light emission
Do we live in a 2-D hologram? New Fermilab experiment will test the nature of the universe
Duality principle is 'safe and sound': Researchers clear up apparent violation of wave-particle duality
vanhees71
#2
Apr15-12, 10:12 AM
Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 2,456
Indeed, there's no principle against the existence of magnetic monopoles. In this sense it's a mystery, why there are no elementary magnetic charges in nature.

However, not long ago, one has found a funny material, which behaves like a socalled "spin ice". In this substance one has found collective excitations (quasiparticles) which behaves like magnetic monopoles. There are a lot of such examples in condensed matter physics!
liumylife
#3
Apr17-12, 11:43 PM
P: 11
OK, since the quasipartical behaves like monopole, dose it produce magnetic field? Does moving "spin ice" produce EMR?


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Magnetic Monopole? General Physics 11
Magnetic monopole Introductory Physics Homework 0
Is there a magnetic field inside the 't Hooft-Polyakov magnetic monopole? Beyond the Standard Model 0
Magnetic monopole Advanced Physics Homework 3
Magnetic Monopole Classical Physics 13