Does macroscopic magnetic monopole contradict physics?


by liumylife
Tags: magnetic, monopole
liumylife
liumylife is offline
#1
Apr15-12, 07:55 AM
P: 11
I know Dirac had said yes to existence of microscopic monopole by quantum theory, so why not the macroscopic monopole?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Information storage for the next generation of plastic computers
Scientists capture ultrafast snapshots of light-driven superconductivity
Progress in the fight against quantum dissipation
vanhees71
vanhees71 is offline
#2
Apr15-12, 10:12 AM
Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 2,132
Indeed, there's no principle against the existence of magnetic monopoles. In this sense it's a mystery, why there are no elementary magnetic charges in nature.

However, not long ago, one has found a funny material, which behaves like a socalled "spin ice". In this substance one has found collective excitations (quasiparticles) which behaves like magnetic monopoles. There are a lot of such examples in condensed matter physics!
liumylife
liumylife is offline
#3
Apr17-12, 11:43 PM
P: 11
OK, since the quasipartical behaves like monopole, dose it produce magnetic field? Does moving "spin ice" produce EMR?


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Magnetic Monopole? General Physics 11
magnetic monopole Introductory Physics Homework 0
Is there a magnetic field inside the 't Hooft-Polyakov magnetic monopole? Beyond the Standard Model 0
Magnetic monopole Advanced Physics Homework 3
Magnetic Monopole Classical Physics 13