New Reply

Does macroscopic magnetic monopole contradict physics?

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Apr15-12, 07:55 AM   #1
 

Does macroscopic magnetic monopole contradict physics?


I know Dirac had said yes to existence of microscopic monopole by quantum theory, so why not the macroscopic monopole?
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
physics news on PhysOrg.com

>> Iron-platinum alloys could be new-generation hard drives
>> Lab sets a new record for creating heralded photons
>> Breakthrough calls time on bootleg booze
Apr15-12, 10:12 AM   #2
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Indeed, there's no principle against the existence of magnetic monopoles. In this sense it's a mystery, why there are no elementary magnetic charges in nature.

However, not long ago, one has found a funny material, which behaves like a socalled "spin ice". In this substance one has found collective excitations (quasiparticles) which behaves like magnetic monopoles. There are a lot of such examples in condensed matter physics!
 
Apr17-12, 11:43 PM   #3
 
OK, since the quasipartical behaves like monopole, dose it produce magnetic field? Does moving "spin ice" produce EMR?
 
New Reply

Tags
magnetic, monopole
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Does macroscopic magnetic monopole contradict physics?
Thread Forum Replies
Magnetic Monopole? General Physics 11
magnetic monopole Introductory Physics Homework 0
Is there a magnetic field inside the 't Hooft-Polyakov magnetic monopole? Beyond the Standard Model 0
Magnetic monopole Advanced Physics Homework 3
Magnetic Monopole Classical Physics 13