| New Reply |
Does it matter how you define the error in a numerical solution?? |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Apr28-12, 06:51 PM | #1 |
|
|
Does it matter how you define the error in a numerical solution??
If you define the error as numerical solution - exact solution would you be hugely wrong even if you understood what was happening (i know it's the negative of exact - numerical). I wrote a report at uni and realised i defined the error in this way
|
| Apr29-12, 03:22 PM | #2 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Usually when talking about error, the magnitude is most important. The sign is only for clarity.
Typical presentation is V ± E, where V is the value and E is the error. |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Does it matter how you define the error in a numerical solution??
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Define a function via numerical integration in Mathematica | Math & Science Software | 6 | ||
| What calls this error which is related to numerical solution of ODE by Euler method | Differential Equations | 2 | ||
| define time, mass , or matter | General Physics | 4 | ||
| why is matter hard to define? | General Discussion | 14 | ||
| Does Matter/Mass Define Time? | General Physics | 1 | ||