| New Reply |
Efficiency and the Euclidean Algorithm |
Share Thread |
| Feb10-11, 10:21 PM | #1 |
|
|
Efficiency and the Euclidean Algorithm
1. Question
Let b = r_0, r_1, r_2,... be the successive remainders in the Euclidean algorithm applied to a and b. Show that every two steps reduces the remainder by at least one half. In other words, verify that r_(i+2) < (1/2)r_i for every i = 0,1,2,... 2. Attempt at a solution I take an arbitrary 'line' in the euclidean algorithm which is of the following form: r_i = q_(i+2) x r_(i+1) + r_(i + 2) So clearly I have the following: 1 > r_(i+2) / r_(i+1), because r_0 > r_1 > r_2 ... Now q_(i+2) >= 1. So we have: q_(i+2) > r_(i+2) / r_(i+1) Which implies: q_(i+2) x r_(i+1) > r_(i+2) q_(i+2) x r_(i+1) + r_(i+2) > 2r_(i+2) But q_(i+2) x r_(i+1) + r_(i+2) = r_i. Thus, r_i > 2r_(i+2) which is what I wanted to prove. 3. Comments However, I see possible problems with this proof. To begin with, the Euclidean Algorithm I am working with doesn't explicitly state that a > 0 or b > 0, but in this question it seems to be implicitly be saying that b > 0 (and says nothing of a) because b = r_0 which must be greater than 0. But if a were negative and b positive I could have a q which is not necessarily positive (more specifically, not greater or equal to 1) which would mess up my proof. But since it seems to be that b > 0 then q's will always be strictly greater than 1, even though it could be possible that the first q could turn out to be negative (for example in, a = -9 and b = 4 in which case q = -3 and r = 3). See what I mean? I would prefer if people could help me sort this proof out rather than give me ideas of how to go about it differently. I'd appreciate the help! :) |
| Feb14-11, 07:41 AM | #2 |
|
|
Anyone?
|
| May9-12, 01:57 PM | #3 |
|
|
I know you asked for people not to give you a different method. However, it seems to me you're doing a lot more work than you need to.
Since ri=qi+2ri+1+ri+2 and qi+2≥1, you have ri≥ri+1+ri+2. Then since ri+1>ri+2, you have ri>ri+2+ri+2⇔ri>2ri+2⇔ri+2<1/2ri. Further, since gcd(a,b)=gcd(-a,b)=gcd(a,-b)=gcd(-a,-b), you may use the absolute values of a and b while using the algorithm, ensuring that every q is always greater or equal to 1. |
| New Reply |
Similar discussions for: Efficiency and the Euclidean Algorithm
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Euclidean algorithm Proof | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 1 | ||
| Euclidean algorithm | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 3 | ||
| Euclidean algorithm | Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics | 2 | ||
| euclidean algorithm | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 4 | ||
| Euclidean algorithm | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 1 | ||