|May31-12, 07:30 PM||#1|
Your Opinions On Archaeology
Archaeology is a bit of a clumsy tool when it comes proving historical facts. I believe that we can all agree with that.
However, there are some people who are even more extremist in their views and want Archaeology to be of a much lower status.
I am curious if you guys agree with the 2 quotes below?
1. "Archaeology is only a supplement to History."
2. "Archaeology is not only clumsy, it cannot be used to disprove historical textual evidence."
|May31-12, 07:54 PM||#2|
|May31-12, 08:36 PM||#3|
Evo, I hope you plan on locking this thread when he can't provide any reputable source for such a statement.
|Similar Threads for: Your Opinions On Archaeology|
|I need to find a good instructional book on amateur archaeology?||Social Sciences||1|
|The Do You Know Archaeology Test||General Discussion||10|
|Is Archaeology More of a Hard Science than a Social Science?||Social Sciences||11|
|Archaeology on the net||History & Humanities||2|
|Archimedes Archaeology...||General Math||0|