| New Reply |
Lasers and Focusing Lenses |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Jul26-12, 05:48 PM | #1 |
|
|
Lasers and Focusing Lenses
I'm doing this for a home project over the summer.
So lets say I took a small laser and passed the beam through some focusing lenses (or evena single lense). Is it possible for the beam to expand? Also, if the laser is powerful enough to burn through paper, will the focusing lenses be damaged? Thank You very much to anybody who answers.
|
| Jul26-12, 08:04 PM | #2 |
|
Mentor
Blog Entries: 10
|
Welcome to PF.
|
| Jul26-12, 08:16 PM | #3 |
|
|
Wow, thanks so much, it's really going to help. If it's not any trouble, I'd like to ask a few more questions.
So, the beam will expand, not refract right? Also, it will when it expands, it won't take on a flash-light type role, where the light is shining everywhere right? |
| Jul26-12, 09:54 PM | #4 |
|
|
Lasers and Focusing Lensessee this link .... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lens_(optics) yes after going through a concave lens the laser light beam will be spread out into a more diffuce bright glow rather than a narrow beam. cheers Dave |
| Jul26-12, 10:06 PM | #5 |
|
|
Okay, thanks, the link also helped. :D
The goal of my project is to pass a laser beam through a concave lens to spread out the beam and increasing it in size, but then also sending it through a convex lens so that it focuses. Both of the lenses will be circles, so my plan is to have the straight beam turn into a more circular beam by the time it passes through both of the lenses (so it will be like a tubelight with out the actual tube). Although, I do think I will need more than two lenses. Not sure if this will work, hopefully it will. Do you think it will work in the end, after a lot of tweaking, or is this plan hopeless? :D I won't care if you jsut crush my plan right before my eyes, I don't like wasting my time doing something that won't work in the end. |
| Jul26-12, 10:20 PM | #6 |
|
|
Think about the way a refractor telescope (the one with lenses) or binoculars work.... if they changed the shape of the light beam from an object, we would never see that object the way it looks without the lens. we see the same shape, just magnified..... look a little way down that wiki page to the heading .... Imaging properties to see what I mean Dave |
| Jul26-12, 10:33 PM | #7 |
|
|
Are you sure your skills are up to it? |
| Jul27-12, 11:23 AM | #8 |
|
|
Oh, so I need to find another way to expand it...
And yes, my skills are up to it, I have protective goggles.
|
| Jul27-12, 01:01 PM | #9 |
|
|
You need a rather strong lens (short focal length) to expand the laser much. You might have better luck with a drop of water to function as the lens.
|
| Jul27-12, 01:44 PM | #10 |
|
|
|
| Jul27-12, 09:26 PM | #11 |
|
|
It sounds like you want to expand the beam, this can be done using 2 lenses, both "focusing" lenses. You'll need to find the focal length of each lens.
You can get a good estimate of the focal length of a lens by holding the lens over a table directly underneath a florescent light bulb. Changing the height above the table should change the clarity of the image you see on the table. When you can see the image clearly, measure the distance. This is roughly the focal length. Next, you'll want to pass the laser beam through the shorter focal length lens first. The beam will focus to a point and begin to diverge afterwards. When the beam travels 2 focal distances, it will be at its original size (beam diameter). You'll want to place the longer focal length lens at exactly its focal length after the point when the beam is focused to the tightest spot (1 focal length of the first lens). As the beam travels beyond 2f it expands to a size larger than its original diameter, when you place the second lens you will collimate the beam (reduce divergence as much as possible). Thus, the placement of the second lens is more critical. You should play with the distance, while observing the spot size at a point far away. It should exit the lens and stay roughly the same size. Good luck. |
| Jul27-12, 09:43 PM | #12 |
|
Mentor
Blog Entries: 9
|
In addition, to get a reasonalbe measure of the focal length the distance to lamp or over head light needs to be greater then 10x the focal distance. Note that you will be focusing an image of the source. |
| Jul30-12, 05:26 PM | #13 |
|
Mentor
Blog Entries: 10
|
|
| Jul31-12, 03:50 PM | #14 |
|
|
really? That's great! :D
But the shape will be a circle right? not something ugly or malformed? :D |
| Jul31-12, 03:55 PM | #15 |
|
|
|
| Jul31-12, 04:01 PM | #16 |
|
|
Okay, thanks. :D
Now all I have to worry about is making sure the beam still has enough intenisty to brun someone when it coems out of the lenses. |
| Aug2-12, 01:02 AM | #17 |
|
|
all laser beams are zernike polynomial functions(mostly),
however the basic TEM00 mode is guassian, these beams, have a beam waist, where the are the thinnest, or where the spot size is least, correspondingly they have what is called a railegh range, within which the beam does not diverge appreciably, if you force it to converge by a lens, you reduce the rayleigh length, further to burn the paper, you need high energy focussed, but you are also limited by your laser energy, you need to keep it long at the beam waist to actually burn it, if you are working with an ordinary low power laser |
| New Reply |
| Tags |
| lasers, lenses, light, refraction |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Lasers and Focusing Lenses
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Focusing Light | General Physics | 11 | ||
| E=mc2 focusing on c2 | General Physics | 19 | ||
| Eye focusing | Introductory Physics Homework | 2 | ||
| Focusing X-Rays with Lenses | General Physics | 18 | ||
| Solid state lasers (LEDs), gas lasers, and liquid lasers(?) | Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics | 21 | ||