New Reply

Question about graphing a shape on the cartesian coordinate system

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Aug4-12, 07:03 PM   #1
 

Question about graphing a shape on the cartesian coordinate system


How would you graph a square of any dimension on the cartesian coordinate system?
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
mathematics news on PhysOrg.com

>> Mathematicians analyze social divisions using cell phone data
>> Can math models of gaming strategies be used to detect terrorism networks?
>> Mathematician proves there are infinitely many pairs of prime numbers less than 70 million units apart
Aug4-12, 10:20 PM   #2
 
Hey mesa.

What exactly do you mean? Do you mean instead of representing x you represent x2 for a particular vector (where x is the 1st element of the vector)?
Aug4-12, 11:16 PM   #3
 
Quote by chiro View Post
Hey mesa.

What exactly do you mean? Do you mean instead of representing x you represent x2 for a particular vector (where x is the 1st element of the vector)?
Any way you like, I just want to see other solutions than mine.
Aug4-12, 11:28 PM   #4
 

Question about graphing a shape on the cartesian coordinate system


Well you can do it in a few different ways.

If you represent your system as <x2,y,z> then your co-ordinate system will look like a normal Cartesian system with the negative region for x < 0 removed entirely.

However if you want to represent <x,y,z>, then you will get a contracted transformed version of the x-axis, but if you are going from the x2 to x, then you have the branch problem since you lose information of the sign by squaring the term.

What happens is that for x as opposed to its square, the rate of change along the axis is not uniform or linear, but non-linear: in the linear case if you double the magnitude on the x-axis you double the x value but in a non-linear if you double the magnitude the value is not simple double: it is less or greater than.
Aug4-12, 11:41 PM   #5
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Maybe mesa means an actual square (quadrilateral)?
Aug5-12, 12:06 AM   #6
 
Quote by Mentallic View Post
Maybe mesa means an actual square (quadrilateral)?
Yes, an actual square.
Sorry about that Chiro, I should have read your post more carefully and been more specific.
Aug5-12, 02:30 AM   #7
 
Ohh I see what you're saying now.

It depends on the number of dimensions and the particular attribute you are trying to visualize.

Typically what happens in high-dimensional spaces, is that a specific kind of projection is used to create a visual of that attribute in a two or three dimensional space.

The short answer is that it depends on the attribute you are trying to visualize, but the kinds of things would most likely be similar if not equivalent to the ones used in a normal cartesian geometry. (It's hard to give specifics without specifics).
Aug5-12, 11:33 AM   #8
 
Quote by chiro View Post
Ohh I see what you're saying now.

It depends on the number of dimensions and the particular attribute you are trying to visualize.

Typically what happens in high-dimensional spaces, is that a specific kind of projection is used to create a visual of that attribute in a two or three dimensional space.

The short answer is that it depends on the attribute you are trying to visualize, but the kinds of things would most likely be similar if not equivalent to the ones used in a normal cartesian geometry. (It's hard to give specifics without specifics).
Basically I am looking for (an)other function(s) that will result in a graph of a plain old square on a two dimensional cartesian coordinate system.

If there is more than one solution then pick your favorite, this is new territory for me although it was a great deal of fun working up a solution.

Now my function can graph a square about the origin although I am having difficulty limiting the range/domain outside of it lol. I have also played with trying to make rectangles too off the original function but I changed x to being a dependent variable along with y so transformations and deformations seem to work very differently than what I am used to... Yikes!,
should be fun :)
Aug5-12, 03:39 PM   #9
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Homework Helper Homework Help
Quote by mesa View Post
Basically I am looking for (an)other function(s) that will result in a graph of a plain old square on a two dimensional cartesian coordinate system.
##|x|+|y|=1##

##max \{ |x|,|y|\} = 1##
Aug5-12, 04:30 PM   #10
 
Quote by LCKurtz View Post
##|x|+|y|=1##

##max \{ |x|,|y|\} = 1##
That's a nice solution, and takes care of the domain/range problems I was having.
Got anything else?
Aug5-12, 05:14 PM   #11
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Homework Helper Homework Help
Quote by mesa View Post
That's a nice solution, and takes care of the domain/range problems I was having.
Got anything else?
You can rotate and translate it to anywhere and resize it by changing the 1:$$

|(x-a)\cos(\alpha)-(y-b)\sin(\alpha)|+|(x-a)\sin(\alpha)+(y-b)\cos(\alpha)| = 1$$
Aug5-12, 07:16 PM   #12
 
Quote by LCKurtz View Post
You can rotate and translate it to anywhere and resize it by changing the 1:$$

|(x-a)\cos(\alpha)-(y-b)\sin(\alpha)|+|(x-a)\sin(\alpha)+(y-b)\cos(\alpha)| = 1$$
Very interesting, okay from your answers I think I see how I might fix my domain/range issues.

As it stands I have:

[(y^2)^(1/2)-n]^2 = x^2

with n being the number that fixes the size of the square. I used a trig based function that produced a square root of -1 to keep the domain/range in check outside the 'square' but it's just tacked on and even though it sort of works it's kind of crappy so I removed it in search of a proper solution.
Aug5-12, 07:42 PM   #13
 
[tex]|x+y|-|x-y| = 1[/tex]
Aug5-12, 07:55 PM   #14
 
Quote by acabus View Post
[tex]|x+y|-|x-y| = 1[/tex]
Isn't there a problem at x=0 or am I missing something?
Aug5-12, 09:22 PM   #15
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Homework Helper Homework Help
Quote by acabus View Post
[tex]|x+y|-|x-y| = 1[/tex]
Quote by mesa View Post
Isn't there a problem at x=0 or am I missing something?
That's just a typo, he means ##|x+y|+|x-y|=1##. Same as my first one but squared up with the axes.
Aug6-12, 09:13 AM   #16
 
Quote by LCKurtz View Post
That's just a typo, he means ##|x+y|+|x-y|=1##. Same as my first one but squared up with the axes.
You're right, thanks.
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Question about graphing a shape on the cartesian coordinate system
Thread Forum Replies
Convert this rectangular coordinate system point to spherical coordinate system Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Combination of cartesian and cylindrical coordinate system General Physics 0
Cartesian and Polar coordinate system increments Calculus 8
Cartesian coordinate space transformation question Linear & Abstract Algebra 0
How to convert cylindrical coordinate to cartesian coordinate? Precalculus Mathematics Homework 1