| New Reply |
Subtracting LUB and GLB to approach function |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Aug7-12, 04:57 PM | #18 |
|
|
Subtracting LUB and GLB to approach function
How do we know that the limit as n goes to infinity is 0?
Your tex isn't working either. |
| Aug7-12, 04:59 PM | #19 |
|
Recognitions:
|
My tex is beautiful!!! What's wrong with it? |
| Aug7-12, 05:03 PM | #20 |
|
|
Yeah sorry.. My tex isn't working either. Which is weird because I'm on my iPad so it's not like I touched any settings.
oh lovely on the definition of an integral. I see it is all there. Thanks, I will spend some time staring at that. Right after I figure out what happened to my tex... Thanks! |
| Aug7-12, 05:32 PM | #21 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Perhaps I should add that those ##m_v## would define a set of narrow rectangles that are below the graph of f(x).
That is, they would be a set of inscribed rectangles with height ##m_v##. The summed area of those rectangles approach the integral as the rectangles become narrower. This is the way the Riemann integral is defined. |
| Aug7-12, 05:40 PM | #22 |
|
|
Yeah I'm okay with how the sums are like integrals, I just wasn't sure how to get the difference between the upper and lower sums to be less than epsilon.
|
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Subtracting LUB and GLB to approach function
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Which approach is nicer? UK MEI approach? American approach? | Academic Guidance | 0 | ||
| Green's function approach using Lebesgue integration | Differential Equations | 59 | ||
| Green Function approach is more physical? | High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics | 1 | ||
| Intiutive approach to Green's function for SE | Quantum Physics | 1 | ||
| Distribution function approach to error propagation | Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics | 5 | ||