Electron boosted by an electric field

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the motion of an electron in an electric field described by the equation \(\vec{E}=E_0 e^{-(x_1-ct)^2}\vec{e_2}\). The original poster is tasked with calculating the electron's motion under the assumption that its velocity is much less than the speed of light, and subsequently determining the total flux of radiation emitted by the electron.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply Newton's laws to calculate the motion of the electron and questions the relevance of the radiation electric field in this context. Participants discuss whether the calculation pertains to total power radiated or just the flux of the radiation electric field, with references to the Larmor formula and the Abraham-Lorentz formula being raised.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the problem, particularly regarding the forces acting on the electron and the implications of the radiation electric field. There is a suggestion to use the Larmor formula for calculating the total power radiated, but no consensus has been reached on the approach to the motion of the electron or the use of the provided expression for the radiation electric field.

Contextual Notes

The problem does not explicitly instruct the use of the radiation electric field expression provided in the text, leading to uncertainty about its relevance in the calculations. The original poster is also navigating the implications of the radiation reaction force in their analysis.

lailola
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
I have an electric field,

[itex]\vec{E}=E_0 e^{-(x_1-ct)^2}\vec{e_2}[/itex]

that boosts an electron that initially is at rest at (0,0,0). I have to calculate the motion of the electron (supposing v<<c and Newton Law is valid). Then, calculate total flux of radiation.

As v<<c I suppose I can assume that the induced magnetic field due to the time-dependent electric field is negligible. Using Newton equation:

[itex]ma=q(E+E_{rad})[/itex]

In the text they give me the expression of the radiation electric field,

[itex]E_{rad}(\vec{x})=-∫d^3x' \frac{\dot{[\vec{j}]}}{c^2 |\vec{x}-\vec{x'}|}[/itex]

But I don't know how to calculate this.

My other doubt is about the calculation of the total flux, what expression shoud I use?

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you trying to calculate the total power radiated ([itex]\oint \mathbf{S}_{\text{rad}} \cdot d\mathbf{a}[/itex]), or just the flux of [itex]\mathbf{E}_{\text{rad}}[/itex]? If it is the power you want, you can probably just use the Larmor formula.
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Are you trying to calculate the total power radiated ([itex]\oint \mathbf{S}_{\text{rad}} \cdot d\mathbf{a}[/itex]), or just the flux of [itex]\mathbf{E}_{\text{rad}}[/itex]? If it is the power you want, you can probably just use the Larmor formula.

It is said 'total flux', but maybe it's only the contribution of the radiation field... I don't know.

Any idea for the first part?

thanks for your help
 
lailola said:
It is said 'total flux', but maybe it's only the contribution of the radiation field... I don't know.

I interpret that as the total power (flux of the Poyting vector at infiinity) radiated. So I think you should just be able to use the Larmor formula.

Any idea for the first part?

You mean calculating the motion of the electron? If so, there are only two forces affecting it. One is the electric force from the external field [itex]\mathbf{E}=E_0 e^{-(x_x1 - ct)^2)} \mathbf{e}_2[/itex]. Can you think of the other one?
 
gabbagabbahey said:
I interpret that as the total power (flux of the Poyting vector at infiinity) radiated. So I think you should just be able to use the Larmor formula.



You mean calculating the motion of the electron? If so, there are only two forces affecting it. One is the electric force from the external field [itex]\mathbf{E}=E_0 e^{-(x_x1 - ct)^2)} \mathbf{e}_2[/itex]. Can you think of the other one?

The electric force from the radiation electric field?
 
lailola said:
The electric force from the radiation electric field?

If you mean the so-called radiation reaction force, then yes. Have you come across the Abraham-Lorentz formula yet? If so, use it and you will get a differential equation you can solve for the acceleration of the electron.
 
gabbagabbahey said:
If you mean the so-called radiation reaction force, then yes. Have you come across the Abraham-Lorentz formula yet? If so, use it and you will get a differential equation you can solve for the acceleration of the electron.

But, then, I won't use the expression for the radiation electric field that is given in the text.
 
lailola said:
But, then, I won't use the expression for the radiation electric field that is given in the text.

The radiation electric field of the electron doesn't act on the electron. There is no force [itex]q\mathbf{E}_{rad}[/itex] on the electron. Rather, the radiation part of the electric and magnetic fields carry away momentum from the particle off to infinity. The rate at which that momentum is carried off (i.e. the reaction force on the electron) is given by the Abraham Lorentz formula.

Is your problem taken from a textbook (if so, please give the name of the text and the problem number)? Does the problem explicitly tell you to use the formula for [itex]\mathbf{E}_{rad}[/itex]?
 
No, it's just given.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K