New Reply

Japan Earthquake: nuclear plants

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Sep2-12, 06:48 PM   #13652
 

Japan Earthquake: nuclear plants


I'll let you know if I find the older documentary. Hope its better than the one you detailed, I watched it a week or two ago as I was interested in the worker interviews, oh what a dreadful program it turned out to be. It was interesting but not for the right reasons, very bad dramatisation and quite a mess of facts, some misleading details and loads of important detail about problems missing. Not even sure why they bothered mentioning reactor 3 as they failed to tell its story, and the story of reactor 2 seemed rather mangled in some respects.

The one thing they managed to achieve via bad drama and the mess of facts was a sense of the urgency felt on site when struggling to open valves of one sort or another. But those seeking to get clear in their minds the complex set of successful and failed attempts at venting, especially at reactor 2, will not be so well served by that program.

The theory about SR valve problems was interesting but again was not very well served by the format of the program. And by focussing on it for a while and not even mentioning a range of other problems, a rather distorted impression of what might have happened at reactor 2 was given.
 
Sep3-12, 06:43 AM   #13653

Nuclear Engineering 2012
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by tsutsuji View Post
27 August 2012 government-Tokyo Electric mid and long term response committee, steering committee (9th meeting)

3-1 Cooling by closed loop water injection

http://www.meti.go.jp/earthquake/nuc...120827_01g.pdf Inspection inside unit 1's PCV
1) Previous related topics:
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthr...54#post3934954 6th meeting (25 May 2012) Execution of internal survey into unit 1 primary containment vessel (PCV)

2) Translation:

01/17

02/17

03/17
Attached Thumbnails
unit 1 endoscope mission 01of17.png   unit 1 endoscope mission 02of17.png   unit 1 endoscope mission 03of17.png  
 
Sep3-12, 06:45 AM   #13654

Nuclear Engineering 2012
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
2) Translation:

04/17

05/17

06/17
Attached Thumbnails
unit 1 endoscope mission 04of17.jpg   unit 1 endoscope mission 05of17.png   unit 1 endoscope mission 06of17.png  
 
Sep3-12, 06:47 AM   #13655

Nuclear Engineering 2012
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
2) Translation:

07/17

08/17

09/17
Attached Thumbnails
unit 1 endoscope mission 07of17.jpg   unit 1 endoscope mission 08of17.png   unit 1 endoscope mission 09of17.png  
 
Sep3-12, 06:50 AM   #13656

Nuclear Engineering 2012
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
2) Translation:

10/17

11/17

12/17
Attached Thumbnails
unit 1 endoscope mission 10of17.png   unit 1 endoscope mission 12of17.png   unit 1 endoscope mission 11of17.png  
 
Sep3-12, 06:52 AM   #13657

Nuclear Engineering 2012
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
2) Translation:

13/17

14/17

15/17
Attached Thumbnails
unit 1 endoscope mission 13of17.jpg   unit 1 endoscope mission 14of17.png   unit 1 endoscope mission 15of17.png  
 
Sep3-12, 06:57 AM   #13658

Nuclear Engineering 2012
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
2) Translation:

16/17

17/17
Attached Thumbnails
unit 1 endoscope mission 16of17.jpg   unit 1 endoscope mission 17of17.png  
 
Sep3-12, 08:08 AM   #13659

Nuclear Engineering 2012
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by tsutsuji View Post
http://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/genpatsu-...830/index.html On 30 August afternoon, water injection rates into units 1,2,3 were found temporarily to be lower than the specified values. At 03:00 PM, unit 1 had 4 ton/hour, unit 2 5.5 ton/hour, unit 3 5.6 ton/hour. These are 10% lower than the specified values agreed by the NISA for cooling the reactors. Tepco took countermeasures such as opening valves and one hour later the injection rates had recovered to specified values.

http://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/genpatsu-...00_chusui.html The same problem happened again in the night of 30 August at around 08:00 PM. At 10:30 PM the injection rates were recovered, rising above specified values. Tepco suspects there is a problem with the pump, and switched to a back-up pump, while the suspected pump is investigated.
http://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/genpatsu-...901/index.html The same problem occurred 5 times again from 00:00 AM to 03:00 PM on 31 August. The cause has still not been found [as of 1 September]

http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/nu/fukushi...20903_01-e.pdf Decrease in the Reactor Injection Water Amounts at Unit 1-3 of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station
 
Sep3-12, 08:19 AM   #13660
 
Quote by tsutsuji View Post
http://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/genpatsu-...901/index.html The same problem occurred 5 times again from 00:00 AM to 03:00 PM on 31 August. The cause has still not been found [as of 1 September]

http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/nu/fukushi...20903_01-e.pdf Decrease in the Reactor Injection Water Amounts at Unit 1-3 of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station
Happy thousandth post!
 
Sep3-12, 08:47 AM   #13661

Nuclear Engineering 2012
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by zapperzero View Post
Happy thousandth post!
Thanks. I had not noticed it was the thousandth.
 
Sep3-12, 04:52 PM   #13662
 
Admin
Quote by a.ua. View Post
Yes, I know it.
But I'm asking about the primary containment vessel, not the reactor vessel.
TEPСO said that there was no explosion, but
"A picture is worth a thousand words."
It was the secondary containment, the steel and masonary [super]structure above primary containment that had the fire and damage. It is surmised that hydrogen from unit 3 came through the shared duct work that caused the fire. Initially, there was concern that the spent fuel pool went dry and core (reinsert fuel) severely oxidized and produced substantial hydrogen. Later pictures seemed to show that the spent fuel and reinsert fuel was intact, but there might be damage, especially after the introduction of saltwater.

Of course, all primary containments were subject to seismic vibration and possible damage.

I have not followed the details for several months, so I'm not familiar with the current understanding of unit 4's situation.
 
Sep4-12, 07:52 AM   #13663

Nuclear Engineering 2012
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by tsutsuji View Post
27 August 2012 government-Tokyo Electric mid and long term response committee, steering committee (9th meeting)

3-1 Cooling by closed loop water injection
http://www.meti.go.jp/earthquake/nuc...120827_01j.pdf Nitrogen injection into unit 1's suppression chamber
2) Translation:

01/11

02/11

03/11
Attached Thumbnails
unit 1 nitrogen into suppression chamber 01of11.png   unit 1 nitrogen into suppression chamber 02of11.png   unit 1 nitrogen into suppression chamber 03of11.jpg  
 
Sep4-12, 07:55 AM   #13664

Nuclear Engineering 2012
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
2) Translation:

04/11

05/11

06/11
Attached Thumbnails
unit 1 nitrogen into suppression chamber 04of11.png   unit 1 nitrogen into suppression chamber 05of11.png   unit 1 nitrogen into suppression chamber 06of11.png  
 
Sep4-12, 07:59 AM   #13665

Nuclear Engineering 2012
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
2) Translation:

07/11

08/11

09/11
Attached Thumbnails
unit 1 nitrogen into suppression chamber 07of11.png   unit 1 nitrogen into suppression chamber 08of11.png   unit 1 nitrogen into suppression chamber 09of11.png  
 
Sep4-12, 08:06 AM   #13666

Nuclear Engineering 2012
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
2) Translation:

10/11

11/11
Attached Thumbnails
unit 1 nitrogen into suppression chamber 10of11.png   unit 1 nitrogen into suppression chamber 11of11.png  
 
Sep4-12, 05:16 PM   #13667
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
We all owe a vote of thanks to Tsutsuji-san for his extraordinary work.
Without his efforts, there would be essentially no ongoing english language coverage of this unprecedented engineering effort. Instead, we are getting almost real time updates on the clean up as it progresses.
I am impressed by the effort put forth, even though we can deplore that this huge investment will at best be a dead weight loss to the Japanese economy.
 
Sep4-12, 06:21 PM   #13668
 
Admin
Quote by etudiant View Post
We all owe a vote of thanks to Tsutsuji-san for his extraordinary work.
Without his efforts, there would be essentially no ongoing english language coverage of this unprecedented engineering effort. Instead, we are getting almost real time updates on the clean up as it progresses.
I am impressed by the effort put forth, even though we can deplore that this huge investment will at best be a dead weight loss to the Japanese economy.
Those four units were a loss to the Japanese economy as soon as the tsunami hit and took out the ECCSs followed by flooding with seawater. The recovery (and decontamination and decomissinoning) adds more to the loss column. They also lost the infrastructure and housing that was destroyed by the tsunami - not to mention the loss of life.

The cost to replace the power plants on the order of $billions.
 
New Reply

Tags
japan, nuclear
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Japan Earthquake: nuclear plants
Thread Forum Replies
8.9 earthquake in Japan: tsunami warnings Current Events 671
New Nuclear Plants Nuclear Engineering 9
Gen IV Nuclear Plants Nuclear Engineering 10
New Nuclear Plants Nuclear Engineering 14
Astronomer Predicts Major Earthquake for Japan General Discussion 65