Urgent! Real quick question! Can we make a conclusion/inference from this graph?


by riseofphoenix
Tags: graph, real, urgent
riseofphoenix
riseofphoenix is offline
#1
Nov14-12, 06:12 PM
P: 298


This is what I did on StatsCrunch using the data they gave me:




Would the answer be B and C?
Because A can't be right...our data goes up to 2000. And while there still is a trend going on (newer homes --> more square ft), we can't really give a "predicted value of 1964 and 2250". So that would eliminate D and E (the fourth option and the sixth option).
Am I right? I only get one submission and I have to choose AT LEAST ONE of these.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Review: With Galaxy S5, Samsung proves less can be more
Making graphene in your kitchen
Study casts doubt on climate benefit of biofuels from corn residue
Number Nine
Number Nine is offline
#2
Nov14-12, 07:11 PM
P: 771
Explain clearly why you rejected the options that you did. I can see an obvious problem with the dataset that you're ignoring.
riseofphoenix
riseofphoenix is offline
#3
Nov14-12, 07:39 PM
P: 298
Quote Quote by Number Nine View Post
Explain clearly why you rejected the options that you did. I can see an obvious problem with the dataset that you're ignoring.
Option 1 is false because the the scatter plot isn't necessarily linear - it's pretty randomized
Option 2 could be true because our parameter is 1920-2000
Option 3 is true.
Options 4, 5, and 6 are false.

Number Nine
Number Nine is offline
#4
Nov14-12, 07:43 PM
P: 771

Urgent! Real quick question! Can we make a conclusion/inference from this graph?


Options 4, 5, and 6 are false.
Explain why.
riseofphoenix
riseofphoenix is offline
#5
Nov14-12, 08:00 PM
P: 298
Quote Quote by Number Nine View Post
Explain why.
Well you can't predict exactly how many square ft. a home built 15 years from the year 2000 will have. Especially considering the limited data that was given.
Option 5 just doesn't make sense to me. So it has to be Options 2 and 3.
Number Nine
Number Nine is offline
#6
Nov14-12, 08:03 PM
P: 771
Quote Quote by riseofphoenix View Post
Well you can't predict exactly how many square ft. a home built 15 years from the year 2000 will have. Especially considering the limited data that was given.
Option 5 just doesn't make sense to me. So it has to be Options 2 and 3.
It "doesn't make sense"? Do you understand the assumptions involved in least squares regression? Does the dataset look like it has equal variance across observations?
riseofphoenix
riseofphoenix is offline
#7
Nov14-12, 08:05 PM
P: 298
Quote Quote by Number Nine View Post
It "doesn't make sense"? Do you understand the assumptions involved in least squares regression? Does the dataset look like it has equal variance across observations?
Oh well not /completely. But to answer your second question, no it doesn't.

So Option 5 would also be the correct answer (along with Options 2 and 3)?
haruspex
haruspex is offline
#8
Nov15-12, 09:52 PM
Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks ∞
P: 9,179
Quote Quote by Number Nine View Post
It "doesn't make sense"? Do you understand the assumptions involved in least squares regression? Does the dataset look like it has equal variance across observations?
That's a fair point, but the question does not specify the kind of analysis to be used. Is it not possible to make allowance for variable variance (heteroscedasticity)?
chiro
chiro is offline
#9
Nov15-12, 10:01 PM
P: 4,570
I'd really want to see an R^2 value for this data because it looks absolutely unusable to say the least given the scatterplot.

If the variables are high un-correlated, then any attempt to create dependencies between the variables is going to be useless.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Real quick question Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
Urgent - Malus Law - Graph Question Advanced Physics Homework 1
Quick Physics Question (Urgent) Introductory Physics Homework 10
Just a real quick question, please help! Introductory Physics Homework 3
quick easy question to make sure i got this Calculus 6