Register to reply

Differential equation resembling to cycloid

Share this thread:
tom-73
#1
Nov15-12, 10:58 AM
P: 2
What is the function corresponding to this ODE:


In complex notation it obviously shows up like this:

a * z''(t) + b * |z'(t)| * z'(t) + c = 0;

The numerical solution shows a graph resembling to a cycloid.

Thanks for any help!
Tom
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Sapphire talk enlivens guesswork over iPhone 6
Geneticists offer clues to better rice, tomato crops
UConn makes 3-D copies of antique instrument parts
haruspex
#2
Nov15-12, 09:30 PM
Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 9,645
Quote Quote by tom-73 View Post
What is the function corresponding to this ODE:


In complex notation it obviously shows up like this:

a * z''(t) + b * |z'(t)| * z'(t) + c = 0;
It does? I don't see how.
If you divide through by the surd and subtract the 1st eqn from the second, I believe you get something integrable.
tom-73
#3
Nov16-12, 06:30 AM
P: 2
Thank you for your comment. I tried to devide and subtract. The problem is the term in the middle: (y' - eps*x') vs. (x' + eps*y')
It makes the situation even worse - I did not succeed in finding a simplified pattern.

The complex notation in my first post has been derived by simply multiplying the 2nd equation by i and adding the result to the first equation.

What I investigated in the meanwhile:

The cycloid ODE in complex notation should be

a * z''(t) + b * z'(t) + c = 0;

The only difference is the multiplication with |z'| in the middle which in fact produces a value near 1 for curtate cycloids with r1 << r0 (the point tracing out the curve is inside the circle, which rolls on a line AND it is close to the center).

The ODEs in my first posts describe a phugoid, a more general form of the cycloid I suppose.

It seems that the phugoid has no analytic solution. Any suggestions?

Tom

haruspex
#4
Nov16-12, 02:07 PM
Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 9,645
Differential equation resembling to cycloid

Sorry, I overlooked what happens to the RHS. My original suggestion was nonsense.
The complex notation in my first post has been derived by simply multiplying the 2nd equation by i and adding the result to the first equation.
Ah yes, I see it now. Sorry for the noise.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Use the differential operator to solve this differential equation Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Simple Sturm-Liouville system resembling Associated-Legendre equation? Differential Equations 5
Simple Differential Equation (Ordinary Differential Equation) Differential Equations 7
Electric current density in conductors not resembling a wire General Physics 4
Parametric equation of a Curtate cycloid Introductory Physics Homework 2