Register to reply

Nationalize Powerball/Mega millions?

Share this thread:
Oltz
#1
Nov28-12, 01:50 PM
P: 12
With all the Hype around the power ball this week I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts about making the "big" pay out games national and directing the funds to Debt repayment?

I would propose that the states all keep the "smaller" games i.e. dailies and scratch offs but that the 2 big games become federal "voluntary" revenue streams.

From what I remember seeing pay out plus administrative costs on those games come to 50% leaving 50% as revenue for the states. So for each 500 Million dollar jackpot the government would also make 500 Million in voluntary taxes.

Some states i.e. Ca and Pa exempt state lottery winnings from state income taxes we could even extend that to the federal level for these federal drawings.

I am not sure the impact taking that revenue from the states would have but IMO it would be minimal since most of it goes to special projects already and is not general budget revenue.

Thoughts? comments? data? I can not look up anything to do with the lottery this network.

Major objections?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
New model helps explain how provisions promote or reduce wildlife disease
Stress can make hard-working mongooses less likely to help in the future
Grammatical habits in written English reveal linguistic features of non-native speakers' languages
Alfi
#2
Nov28-12, 02:30 PM
P: 151
nobody can afford any taxes ... but a half Billion dollars can be given away to buy lotto tickets.

I don't understand.
SteamKing
#3
Nov28-12, 02:46 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 6,265
Current US Debt = 16*10^12 dollars

1 lottery payout = 500 * 10^6 dollars applied 100% to debt payment

number of lottery payouts for total debt repayment = 32000

Oltz
#4
Nov28-12, 02:57 PM
P: 12
Nationalize Powerball/Mega millions?

Quote Quote by SteamKing View Post
Current US Debt = 16*10^12 dollars

1 lottery payout = 500 * 10^6 dollars applied 100% to debt payment

number of lottery payouts for total debt repayment = 32000
I never said it was the entire answer just that it is better then nothing keep in mind that is the pay out from 15 non winning drawings so the annual total for 104 drawings would be in the area of 3.5 Billion which alone would still be 4500 years to pay off the entire debt. Just looking at the numbers should open some eyes to the fact we really need to do something about this.
BobG
#5
Nov28-12, 07:16 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
BobG's Avatar
P: 2,278
Quote Quote by Oltz View Post
With all the Hype around the power ball this week I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts about making the "big" pay out games national and directing the funds to Debt repayment?

I would propose that the states all keep the "smaller" games i.e. dailies and scratch offs but that the 2 big games become federal "voluntary" revenue streams.

From what I remember seeing pay out plus administrative costs on those games come to 50% leaving 50% as revenue for the states. So for each 500 Million dollar jackpot the government would also make 500 Million in voluntary taxes.

Some states i.e. Ca and Pa exempt state lottery winnings from state income taxes we could even extend that to the federal level for these federal drawings.

I am not sure the impact taking that revenue from the states would have but IMO it would be minimal since most of it goes to special projects already and is not general budget revenue.

Thoughts? comments? data? I can not look up anything to do with the lottery this network.

Major objections?
The major objections would come from the states. Over the course of the year, Powerball alone should rake in about $5 billion a year, with 50% going to payouts and 50% being divided among the participating states (based on how many tickets sold in their state). The states would be very upset.

Keep in mind the federal government already takes in 25% of the payouts in federal taxes, or about 12% of the total revenue.
chemisttree
#6
Nov28-12, 08:11 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
chemisttree's Avatar
P: 3,724
I think the major objection should be what role should our government play. Should the government play on the weakness of its citizens and encourage them to take a risk equivalent to flipping a coin and getting 'heads' 27 times in a row? The government should encourage behavior that is an advantage to its citizens or do nothing at all, IMO. Apply an outrageous 'sin' tax on alcohol an tobacco to both raise money and discourage self destructive behavior can at least be rationalized from that standpoint but to regressively tax its citizens and encourage this self destructive gambling behavior?
What's next? Government run horse racing? Slot machines? Online poker?
No thanks.
nanosiborg
#7
Nov29-12, 02:35 AM
P: 79
Quote Quote by chemisttree View Post
I think the major objection should be what role should our government play. Should the government play on the weakness of its citizens and encourage them to take a risk equivalent to flipping a coin and getting 'heads' 27 times in a row? The government should encourage behavior that is an advantage to its citizens or do nothing at all, IMO. Apply an outrageous 'sin' tax on alcohol an tobacco to both raise money and discourage self destructive behavior can at least be rationalized from that standpoint but to regressively tax its citizens and encourage this self destructive gambling behavior?
What's next? Government run horse racing? Slot machines? Online poker?
No thanks.
I agree with this. Governmental public policy really should take the high road (because often people need a little shove to get them to behave in ways that they know are best for them), even though the people who are 'the government' are (or so it seems) often taking the low road.
Oltz
#8
Nov29-12, 07:11 AM
P: 12
Quote Quote by nanosiborg View Post
I agree with this. Governmental public policy really should take the high road (because often people need a little shove to get them to behave in ways that they know are best for them), even though the people who are 'the government' are (or so it seems) often taking the low road.
I would agree with you if all those things were not already state run in all of the states they exist in and got that way by popular vote. Obviously the people want government run gambling and it is always pitched at the state level as a revenue generator why not expand it to federal?

Raising taxes can not fix our problem and the President and Senate have not even mentioned significant cuts we need an outside the box revenue solution to even begin to address the problems we face.
Galteeth
#9
Dec4-12, 12:50 AM
P: 320
I think using gambling to raise tax revenue is a great idea. At least this way, the taxation is voluntary. Obviously, people are going to gamble, and we have a huge deficit problem, so why not?
Jack21222
#10
Dec4-12, 10:16 AM
P: 772
Wait, you want the federal government to come in and take lotteries away from the states? Isn't that a tenth amendment issue?
Oltz
#11
Dec4-12, 10:22 AM
P: 12
No Jack I want the 2 lotteries that are inter state and already present in 84% of the country to be come national. The remaining intra state lottery drawings will remain as is.

Think of it as the draft but instead of picking soldiers they are picking millionaires and you need to pay to enter and can voluntarily enter as many or as few times as you like.
Jack21222
#12
Dec4-12, 06:43 PM
P: 772
Quote Quote by Oltz View Post
No Jack I want the 2 lotteries that are inter state and already present in 84% of the country to be come national.
Right, you want the federal government to come in and take over. I'm not sure this is legal. Maybe you can call it interstate commerce?

EDIT:
Allow me to be more specific in my objection. The governments of several states got together and formed the Multi-State Lottery Association. This association is who runs Powerball and Mega Millions. What you're suggesting is that the federal government comes in and usurps control over this association which is currently run by the states. I do not see how this is legal. Right now, the states have the right to form this association and run their own lottery, and I cannot imagine the federal government stealing this from the states.
Oltz
#13
Dec5-12, 07:26 AM
P: 12
Legality has not stopped this government from sidestepping rules on immigration and environmental regulation why should it on revenue?

I never said it was legal or even "right" just that its an option.

Heck have the fed start its own third major drawing and have it in all 50 states. A voluntary tax still sounds like a fine option.
BWV
#14
Dec5-12, 09:01 AM
P: 328
It would just be simpler if you assessed a special tax on stupid people
Alfi
#15
Dec5-12, 10:42 AM
P: 151
Quote Quote by BWV View Post
It would just be simpler if you assessed a special tax on stupid people
What an interesting idea. I suspect that if you tried to explain and expand that idea, it would answer so many questions, such as, why did you post that?
( Alfi holds up sarcasm sign ... just in case lotto ticket buyers read this)


For my opinion about the big lotteries, I would prefer if the payouts were smaller and therefore more numerous.
As in, instead of one winner of Hundreds of millions, I would like to see hundreds of winners of One Million Dollars each. And ... keep drawing numbers till ALL the prizes have been won.
Tax free ( they already paid the 'stupid tax' by buying into that dream. ) winnings. The government could then tax any gains in the next years,( smart winners ) or if they spend the money in the first year, that is the stimulus for everybody that sold them the stuff they bought.
Travis_King
#16
Dec5-12, 12:09 PM
P: 811
Quote Quote by Jack21222 View Post
Right, you want the federal government to come in and take over. I'm not sure this is legal. Maybe you can call it interstate commerce?

EDIT:
Allow me to be more specific in my objection. The governments of several states got together and formed the Multi-State Lottery Association. This association is who runs Powerball and Mega Millions. What you're suggesting is that the federal government comes in and usurps control over this association which is currently run by the states. I do not see how this is legal. Right now, the states have the right to form this association and run their own lottery, and I cannot imagine the federal government stealing this from the states.
The federal government doesnt have to take over the interstate lottery, it just has to act as a good capitalist and create an alternative lottery with more appeal.

Not saying the states will be happy about it, but the government doesn't have to take over anything, nor dissolve any interstate commerce agreements.
Jack21222
#17
Dec5-12, 09:19 PM
P: 772
Quote Quote by Travis_King View Post
the government doesn't have to take over anything, nor dissolve any interstate commerce agreements.
But that's what the OP had specifically said, I was just commenting on his suggestion, not any alternative suggestions.

I honestly think the federal government would have a hard time competing. Powerball and Mega Millions already have massive brand awareness, and a competitor would likely struggle.
Drakkith
#18
Dec5-12, 09:42 PM
Mentor
Drakkith's Avatar
P: 11,485
I object on ethical grounds. Furthermore I believe that the solution to the debt is to stop spending money, not look for more ways to funnel money from the public to the government, or shift what is already here from the State to the Federal Government.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Dynabee/powerball wrist exerciser terminology Mechanical Engineering 2
Gyroscope-powerball question General Physics 1
Getting energy from earths rotation with a giant powerball nailed to the ground General Physics 3
How does a powerball work? General Physics 4
Anyone here have a Powerball? General Discussion 3