Identify This Real Number


by Norm850
Tags: identify, number, real
Norm850
Norm850 is offline
#1
Dec8-12, 03:22 PM
P: 11
3.5036799918564934004113

I need help identifying this real number. The closest I have gotten is e+pi/4.

But I think it has something to do with the Zeta function?

Please help.

Thanks
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Cougars' diverse diet helped them survive the Pleistocene mass extinction
Cyber risks can cause disruption on scale of 2008 crisis, study says
Mantis shrimp stronger than airplanes
micromass
micromass is offline
#2
Dec8-12, 03:53 PM
Mentor
micromass's Avatar
P: 16,690
Where did you find this number?
Norm850
Norm850 is offline
#3
Dec9-12, 12:20 AM
P: 11
It was asked by my professor as HW, but I have looked and looked and can not find anything online.... I was wondering if anyone else knew where to look or even how to look?

Thanks.

micromass
micromass is offline
#4
Dec9-12, 01:01 AM
Mentor
micromass's Avatar
P: 16,690

Identify This Real Number


Then maybe you should give more information on what class you are taking and what subject you just covered.
Norm850
Norm850 is offline
#5
Dec9-12, 01:07 PM
P: 11
It's just a programming class, so the question isn't all that relevant. Not exactly sure why he asked us this question, but he did. I was trying to use an online inverse symbolic calculator or something, but I just can't find anything.
mathman
mathman is offline
#6
Dec9-12, 03:35 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 5,942
Off hand there doesn't seem to be anything special about this number.
bahamagreen
bahamagreen is offline
#7
Dec9-12, 04:52 PM
P: 503
The class and subject question certainly is relevant and has everything to do with it.

Have you converted to binary and noticed anything?

The presentation of the number as a real is noteworthy because machine operations can't work with reals... maybe the idea is to get you thinking about computable vs real numbers?

Have you noticed it interesting that a 23 digit base 10 number does not have an instance of 2?
Maybe this is a clue to look at the method of compliments?

Or it may be like the version of 20 questions where one only pretends to pick something, but keeps all answers consistent with previous answers. Just to see where it goes?
Norwegian
Norwegian is offline
#8
Dec9-12, 09:55 PM
P: 144
Quote Quote by Norm850 View Post
3.5036799918564934004113
I need help identifying this real number. The closest I have gotten is e+pi/4.
And what do you get if you compute e+pi/4 to 22 decimal places?
oay
oay is offline
#9
Dec9-12, 11:17 PM
P: 221
Quote Quote by bahamagreen View Post
The class and subject question certainly is relevant and has everything to do with it.

Have you converted to binary and noticed anything?

The presentation of the number as a real is noteworthy because machine operations can't work with reals... maybe the idea is to get you thinking about computable vs real numbers?

Have you noticed it interesting that a 23 digit base 10 number does not have an instance of 2?
Maybe this is a clue to look at the method of compliments?

Or it may be like the version of 20 questions where one only pretends to pick something, but keeps all answers consistent with previous answers. Just to see where it goes?
What you've said is really intriguing. Please expand.
haruspex
haruspex is online now
#10
Dec9-12, 11:53 PM
Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks ∞
P: 9,206
Quote Quote by bahamagreen View Post
interesting that a 23 digit base 10 number does not have an instance of 2
Is it? Seems like an 8% chance, and similarly for any other nonzero digit. So it's not that surprising that some digit doesn't feature.
method of compliments?
Flattery will get you nowhere.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Fewest number of segments to identify a know symbol General Math 1
Identify the next number in the pattern General Math 2
proving that a real number exists in between a real number, Calculus 19
Want to identify that a number is prime General Math 14
How do know identify crackpot from real physics General Discussion 20