lagrangian of three bodies, using an exponential potential


by jbay
Tags: bodies, exponential, lagrangian, potential
jbay
jbay is offline
#1
Dec11-12, 01:59 AM
P: 9
What I know:
L = T - V
V = e^(x1-x2) + e^(x2-x3) for n = 3 and a mass = 1

What I believe:
T = .5Ʃ (x'_i)^2 from 1 to n

So lets say you have three bodys that can just be considered pints masses of 1 and on the same line:

x1 x2 x3
They have an exponential potential. What is L?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Physicists design quantum switches which can be activated by single photons
'Dressed' laser aimed at clouds may be key to inducing rain, lightning
Higher-order nonlinear optical processes observed using the SACLA X-ray free-electron laser
andrien
andrien is offline
#2
Dec11-12, 02:01 AM
P: 977
Don't you think you should also consider interaction between 1 and 3.By the way,this is most suited in homework section.
K^2
K^2 is offline
#3
Dec11-12, 03:58 AM
Sci Advisor
P: 2,470
Not necessarily. He said they are points on a line. So the interaction might be pair-wise. Think masses connected by springs, but with a different potential.

jbay, if you take them to be unit mass, yes, that's correct expression for kinetic energy. So if your potential energy is correct, then you have your Lagrangian.

andrien
andrien is offline
#4
Dec11-12, 06:39 AM
P: 977

lagrangian of three bodies, using an exponential potential


what about something like force field in which there will be an interaction between 1 and 3,but it is not clear from context given.
jbay
jbay is offline
#5
Dec11-12, 08:55 AM
P: 9
So I do not need to account for the interaction of 1 and 3 in V. Also great now my only problem is what is x'? Can I integrate V to get it since the e"s are basically acceleration?
K^2
K^2 is offline
#6
Dec11-12, 02:41 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 2,470
We don't know if you need to account for interaction between 1 and 3, because you didn't state the problem clearly enough to deduce that. What kind of interaction are you looking at? Is it pair-wise only between neighbors? Is it a global interaction? You need to define that.

You find your x' after you solve equations of motion. You have the Lagrangian, so you know that your equations of motion will be these.

[tex]\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}_i} - \frac{\partial L}{\partial x_i} = 0[/tex]

Write it out. It will give you a system of 3 partial differential equations. If they separate out nicely, you might be able to solve them to find x(t).
jbay
jbay is offline
#7
Dec13-12, 01:12 AM
P: 9
But how would you do the d/dt portion if there is no t.
K^2
K^2 is offline
#8
Dec13-12, 01:41 AM
Sci Advisor
P: 2,470
It's a total derivative, not a partial one.

[tex]\frac{d}{dt}f(x, \dot{x}) = \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\frac{dx}{dt} + \frac{\partial f}{\partial \dot{x}}\frac{d\dot{x}}{dt} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\dot{x} + \frac{\partial f}{\partial \dot{x}}\ddot{x}[/tex]
andrien
andrien is offline
#9
Dec13-12, 07:04 AM
P: 977
Quote Quote by jbay View Post
But how would you do the d/dt portion if there is no t.
since lagrangian does not contaib explicit time dependence,it means energy is conserved.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Lagrangian for velocity dependent potential Advanced Physics Homework 4
in QFT Lagrangian what is the potential energy exactly? High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 0
Bodies with potential energy Introductory Physics Homework 4
Lagrangian for E and B fields, not vector potential? Classical Physics 1
Lagrangian- what potential? Advanced Physics Homework 1