| New Reply |
Why does hot air rise? |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Aug5-04, 08:38 PM | #52 |
|
Blog Entries: 1
|
Why does hot air rise? |
| Aug6-04, 11:28 AM | #53 |
|
|
Although it looks like the question has been answered sufficiently, here's a bit of additional reading on hot vs. cold air
|
| Aug7-04, 01:04 AM | #54 |
|
|
Take a mole of molecular oxygen (more dense molecules) and a mole of molecular nitrogen (less dense molecules) and combine them in a vessel so that they coalesce randomly at one atmosphere pressure. What is the time evolution of this system while undisturbed?
|
| Aug7-04, 04:07 AM | #55 |
|
|
I had the same problem covered in the topic "heat & weight". I don't know if it's still around. |
| Feb16-10, 01:27 PM | #56 |
|
|
Can someone tell me what this is about
|
| Feb16-10, 01:31 PM | #57 |
|
|
|
| Feb16-10, 10:17 PM | #58 |
|
|
|
| Jan30-12, 08:09 AM | #59 |
|
|
quartodeciman...Dear friend, actually when ever i ask "why hot air rises up" people just tell same old answers but just like you , i honestly believe there is something more waiting to be explained.
Dear I will try a bit to explain : when air gets heated it starts rising because on heating it's molecules gets charged in a way that they repell cooler molecules around them and gets repelled from the earth as well,(hence dont get chance to distribute heat energy) till they reaches a point where the force of gravity (attraction) and force of repulsion because of earth's charge gets balanced and a equilibrium forms.This charge has been observed by NASA as well,this charge helps earth to repel charge coming from the sun. Its my humble attempt ... people please let me know if I am right or wrong.. |
| Jan30-12, 04:53 PM | #60 |
|
|
2. Since we are dealing with moving air, we are dealing with non-equilibrium conditions. None of the classical equations that require conditions of equilibrium can be easily applied. The discussion is best approached through the physical disciplines of statistical thermodynamics and non-equilibrium kinetic gas theory. These disciplines describe macroscopic air movement in terms of statistical functions on the molecular level. 3. Molecular flux is the number of molecules passing through one square meter of an imaginary plane in one second. Under conditions of equilibrium, the molecular flux is the same along either arm of any axis of movement. That is, there are as many molecules with an eastward flux as there are with a westward flux. And, there are as many molecules with an upward flux as there are with a downward flux. This number is one-half the mean molecular number density (n/2) in each case. 4. When a parcel of air is moving, this equivalence no longer holds. When a parcel of air is being pushed upward, the upward flux exceeds the downward flux. That is, more air molecules will have an upward component of movement than will have a downward component of movement. 5. Flux rates are affected by both molecular density and molecular speeds. Under the conditions that are normally found in our atmosphere, density seems to be the more important of the two. Cool air “pushes” against warm air more strongly than warm air pushes against cool air. Hence, the hot-air balloon is pushed up and the cool air spills down off of the Greenland ice-cap. 6. At 1000 hPa, the molecular flux rate (x 1027 molecules m2 sec-1) is: 2.73 at 50°C 2.84 at 25°C 2.97 at 0°C 3.11 at -25°C 7. Hence, cool air flows toward warm air. We describe this by saying that “warm air rises”, but it is actually being pushed up by the cooler air. |
| Jan30-12, 06:00 PM | #61 |
|
|
With the exception of a couple of recent blips, this thread is 8 years old.
|
| Dec22-12, 06:14 AM | #62 |
|
|
I'm aware that this question has been very successfully answered, but allow me to post a more equation-based contribution;
In accordance with P=m/V, if we lower the density of a subsystem (here, the hot air), then providing that its mass does not change, the volume of the subsystem increases. This causes the mass of the hot air to become lower in proportion to the volume.This, due to the weight law W=mg causes a lower overall gravitational effect on the subsystem. Hence, the effect of the Earth on the hot air (lowered in density by an increase in Ek) becomes less significant and so it rises above the cooler air (which is more greatly affected by gravitation). Hope this helps ^.^ |
| Dec22-12, 06:36 AM | #63 |
|
|
For example, the mass of an electron is 9.11x10-31kg and its overall charge is deemed '-1'. A particle experiencing a change in Ek (due to heating) would be subject to a change in mass, but not a change in overall charge. Were this incorrect, particles would behave entirely differently in relation to modern observations; they would have a stronger repulsive effect on some particles and a stronger attractive effect on others (possibly infinite when travelling at c). There's also no reason why only cooler molecules would be repelled, nor why they would be necessarily repelled towards a gravitational field (i.e. downwards). I hope I've provided a valid insight =) |
| Dec22-12, 09:58 AM | #64 |
|
|
Just think about an imaginary bubble enclosing the gas to be heated. V is proportional to T at constant p, so the gas in the bubble expands, becomes less dense and rises (if it is surrounded by cooler, denser gas).
|
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Why does hot air rise?
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| WHY is the sun red during rise and set... | General Astronomy | 2 | ||
| does hot air rise? | Classical Physics | 12 | ||
| Rise and Run | Introductory Physics Homework | 2 | ||