Register to reply 
Magnetism in a current carrying wire 
Share this thread: 
#1
Dec2412, 08:55 PM

P: 534

If we use the right hand rule, we see that a hole current, or positive ion flow, creates a magnetic field around the wire where the flux moves in a clockwise direction. Counteractively, electron flow through a wire produces a magnetic flux that flows counterclockwise over the wire. Three questions:
1. Do I have this right? 2. Why on earth would a positive charge cause a circular flux in one direction whereas a negative charge cause one in the opposite direction? Is there some characteristic of the EM field that is responsible for this? 3. Do we get the same effect if the charges are flowing through free space and not a wire? Like cosmic rays or just shooting a beam of electrons through free space? 


#2
Dec2412, 10:24 PM

P: 17

I recommend reading up Amperes law especially the differential form



#3
Dec2512, 12:34 AM

P: 534

Hmm..I'm not sure I got what I was lookin for for question 3, but your response to question two is interesting:



#4
Dec2512, 02:08 AM

P: 534

Magnetism in a current carrying wire
Oh yeah, there's a perhaps importantlyrelated number 4 question too:
4) Is magnetism a relativistic effect as asserted in this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0H3_y...D99A4&index=27 whereby the sideways force I'm curious about has to do with increased electron charge density due to length contraction? I've heard about this model in a couple different places but it doesn't seem to be widely discussed. Is this relativistic model generally accepted or is it a fringe theory? 


#5
Dec2512, 05:33 AM

Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 2,334

A formula says more than thousend words. The formula in question here is Ampere's Law, i.e., one of the Maxwell equations, specialized for stationary currents. It says
[tex]\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{B}=\vec{J}.[/tex] Further you need the fact that there are no magnetic charges ("monopoles"): [tex]\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{B}=0.[/tex] This together Ampere's Law tells you that only some current density can cause a magnetic field (in this special case of stationary, i.e., timeindependent situations). This tells you that it is only this current density determines the direction and magnitude of the magnetic field. The current density of a single particle is given by [tex]\vec{J}=q \int \mathrm{d} t \dot{\vec{y}}(t) \delta^{(3)}[\vec{x}\vec{y}(t)],[/tex] where [itex]\vec{y}(t)[/itex] is the trajectory of the particle. This tells you that the sign of the charge, of course included in the current density, determines wether the current at any instance of time is pointed in (positive charge) or against (negative charge) the particle's velocity. What goes into the magnetic field is still only the current density and that's it. The righthand rule to determine the direction of the [itex]\vec{B}[/itex] thus applies to this current density and nothing else: Point the thumb of your right hand in direction of the current density the fingers tell you the direction of the magnetic field. That's what's written in Ampere's Law, becaus it is customary to define the vector operations in threedimensional Euclidean space always according to righthand rules. To see this quantitatively at work, we have to solve for the magnetic field in terms of the current density. The vanishing of magnetic charge implies that there exists a vector potential for the magnetic field, i.e., [tex]\vec{B}=\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{A}.[/tex] Further we can use Cartesian coordinates to calculate the curl: [tex]\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{B}=\vec{\nabla} \times (\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{A})=\vec{\nabla}(\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{A})\Delta \vec{A}.[/tex] Now the vector potential is only determined up to the gradient of a scalar field, and thus we can impose one scalar constraint on it. In modern slang the physicists call this "fixing a gauge". Here, it's most convenient to use "Coulomb Gauge", i.e., [tex]\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{A}=0.[/tex] With this Ampere's Law simplifies to [tex]\Delta \vec{A}=\vec{J}.[/tex] This is just the same law (for each component) as that for the electric potential in electrostatics, and thus we can write down the solution immediately. Behind this is of course the Green's function of the Laplace operator: [tex]\vec{A}(\vec{x})=\frac{1}{4 \pi} \int \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x}' \frac{\vec{J}(\vec{x}')}{\vec{x}\vec{x}'}.[/tex] It is easy to check that this solution indeed fufills the Coulombgauge condition, because from Ampere's Law we must impose the constraint [tex]\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{J}=0,[/tex] which is nothing else than the conservation of electric charge for the here considered special case of stationary currents. Now we evaluate the magnetic field. For this we need to take the curl of the above solution. We can lump the differentiation operator under the integral and then use [tex]\vec{\nabla} \times \frac{\vec{J}(\vec{x}')}{\vec{x}\vec{x}'} = \vec{J}(\vec{x}') \times \vec{\nabla} \frac{1}{\vec{x}\vec{x}'}=+\vec{J}(\vec{x}') \times \frac{\vec{x}\vec{x}'}{\vec{x}\vec{x}'^3}.[/tex] This gives you finally BiotSavart's Law [tex]\vec{B}(\vec{x})=\frac{1}{4 \pi} \int \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x}' \vec{J}(\vec{x}') \times \frac{\vec{x}\vec{x}'}{\vec{x}\vec{x}'^3}.[/tex] This formula only deals with vector manipulations and is thus valid in any coordinate system (not only Cartesian coordinates). More intuitive as an example than the magnetic field of a point charge is a steady current along an infinite very thin straight wire. Let's choose the [itex]z[/itex] axis to be directed in the direction of the current densitiy. For this situation we have (in Cartesian coordinates) [tex]\vec{J}(\vec{x}')=\vec{e}_z I \delta(x') \delta(y').[/tex] Then we have [tex]\vec{B}(\vec{x})=\frac{1}{4 \pi} \int \mathrm{d} z' I \vec{e}_z \times \frac{x \vec{e}_x+y \vec{e}_y}{\sqrt{(zz')^2+x^2+y^2}^{3}}.[/tex] The evaluation of the integral gives [tex]\vec{B}(\vec{x})=\frac{I}{2 \pi} \vec{e}_z \times \frac{\vec{x}}{x^2+y^2}.[/tex] It's more intuitive to write this in terms of cylinder coordinates [tex]\vec{B}(\vec{x})=\frac{I}{2 \pi \rho} \vec{e}_{\varphi}.[/tex] As you see, the righthand rule works: The magnetic field curls around the currentconducting wire counterclockwise when looking against the current density. Note that we do not have to think about the motion of the electrons in the wire at all. Of course, they move in negative [itex]z[/itex] direction. Together with their negative charge the current density points into positive [itex]z[/itex] direction. 


#6
Dec2512, 06:37 AM

P: 534

Thanks for the thoroughness of your reply Vanhees. I see some light in there although its going to take me a little time to digest it all. 


#7
Dec2612, 08:12 AM

P: 1,020

you can use either hand,it does not change any physics in most cases.At least in electromagnetism.



Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Force on a wire, by a current carrying wire.  Introductory Physics Homework  3  
Rod of current wire exerting magnetic force on current carrying bar  Introductory Physics Homework  0  
Current carrying wire and induced electric field within the wire  Introductory Physics Homework  2  
Magnetism (CurrentCarrying Wires)  Introductory Physics Homework  6  
Magnetism and Current Carrying wires (?)  Introductory Physics Homework  5 