New Reply

If earth stops rotating

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Dec30-12, 04:00 AM   #1
 

If earth stops rotating


Dear All,

Hi I am a teacher and also new to the forum!!!

Can someone guide me what happens if earth stops rotating suddenly!!

Thanks.

Jayesh.
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
physics news on PhysOrg.com

>> The better to see you with: Scientists build record-setting metamaterial flat lens
>> New analysis yields improvements in a classic 3D imaging technique
>> Research effort deep underground could sort out cosmic-scale mysteries
Dec30-12, 04:15 AM   #2
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Everything would suddenly be uprooted and flung eastward since everything had some kind of rotational velocity before the Earth stopped. (And the Earth is rotating towards the east, which is counterclockwise as viewed from above the north pole) The exact velocity depends on the latitude, with those things at the equator having far more energy and speed than near the poles.
Dec30-12, 06:00 AM   #3
 
Alot depends how fast the rotation is stopped. Imagine driving a sports car at 600 mph and hitting a huge sponge, it would slow you down slowly. But hit a steel wall 30 feet thick and all the energy would be released suddenly and you would have neck problems. As to the earth, the oceans would surge violently and mountain ranges would be displaced along with the tectonic plates and inner molten core would crack through the crust..etc. It would just be a bad day and mess up your hair.
Dec30-12, 08:44 AM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus

If earth stops rotating


The problem is that the OP didn't say anything about how the "stopping" would occur! GIGO. I was, frankly, tempted to say that we would be up to our necks in Easter Bunnies since we are now allowing any sort of magic to happen!
Dec30-12, 11:56 AM   #5
 
Hi All,

Thanks for the reply.

But can I please get some more elaborate answer considering the forces.

I agree that the free objects would fly in to space.

But I also think the effective g would be more because the pseudo centripetal would vanished.

Please correct me and reply.

And wishing you all a Happy New Year in advance.

Jayesh.
Dec30-12, 12:08 PM   #6
 
Admin
Quote by jayeshtrivedi View Post
Hi All,

Thanks for the reply.

But can I please get some more elaborate answer considering the forces.

I agree that the free objects would fly in to space.

But I also think the effective g would be more because the pseudo centripetal would vanished.

Please correct me and reply.

And wishing you all a Happy New Year in advance.

Jayesh.
The effect of gravity would be greater. One can experience this by going to one of the poles (north or south) where there is not centripetal effect.

Stopping the earth suddently/instantly is not a realistic scenario. It would better to ask, what would we experience if the earth did not rotate, or if it rotated much more slowly, e.g., if the earth was tidally locked to the sun. Certainly there is the gravitational effect, but then there is the thermal effect from the sun. The part facing the sun would get very hot, and the part facing away from the sun would get very cold. The weather would be very different.
Dec30-12, 12:36 PM   #7
 
All the angular momentum would go into our heads twisting them off and the human race would die off.
Dec30-12, 01:04 PM   #8
 
I agree that the free objects would fly in to space.
That is incorrect.

Objects right now travelling with the rotation of the earth do not fly into space ( but stopping the earth would then fling them into space??? ) At the equator, an object is travelling at 1000mph along with the rotation of the earth. With a non-rotating earth, that same object would be travelling still at 1000mph but over a non-rotaing earth along the surface.

Why the distinction between free and attached objects. All objects make up the earth - air, people, birds, continents, oceans, core, mantle. If the rotation of the earth stopped suddenly, then all objects of the earth would comply with the non-rotation and not just some and not others, simply because the earth is considered a sum of all of its parts. No catastophic building collapse or giant earthquakes would occur with the only consideration in mind of the earth going from the rotating to the non-rotating.

Unless of course, in this ficticious scenario, the unknown mysterious force can distinguish between the elementary particles ( electrons, protons, quarks, etc ) of say an iron atom deep within the earth to that of an iron atom in the frame of your car, and have an affect on either one diferently.
Jan1-13, 08:55 AM   #9
 
Quote by 256bits View Post
That is incorrect.

Objects right now travelling with the rotation of the earth do not fly into space ( but stopping the earth would then fling them into space??? ) At the equator, an object is travelling at 1000mph along with the rotation of the earth. With a non-rotating earth, that same object would be travelling still at 1000mph but over a non-rotaing earth along the surface.

Why the distinction between free and attached objects. All objects make up the earth - air, people, birds, continents, oceans, core, mantle. If the rotation of the earth stopped suddenly, then all objects of the earth would comply with the non-rotation and not just some and not others, simply because the earth is considered a sum of all of its parts. No catastophic building collapse or giant earthquakes would occur with the only consideration in mind of the earth going from the rotating to the non-rotating.

Unless of course, in this ficticious scenario, the unknown mysterious force can distinguish between the elementary particles ( electrons, protons, quarks, etc ) of say an iron atom deep within the earth to that of an iron atom in the frame of your car, and have an affect on either one diferently.
If the Earth slowed down slowly then yes, if it suddenly stoped then no.Imagine a skyscraper on a conveyor travelling at 1000mph over a non rotateing Earth or allmost, at the north or south pole.Stop the conveyor at once, it's doubtfull the building would remain in one peice.
Jan1-13, 10:01 AM   #10
 
The part facing the sun would get very hot, and the part facing away from the sun would get very cold. The weather would be very different.
__________________

Would the average temperature be higher.The Earth rotateing allows heat to escape into space continuously.One face constantly faceing the Sun might raise the temperature of the Earth overall as the heat could not escape into space as quickly as it would have to pass through the whole Earth to do that.
Jan1-13, 10:20 AM   #11
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
The effect of gravity would be greater.
Why would this happen?

I would have thought that without the angular momentum of rotation, gravity would be reduced...but probably not by much. Consequently I would have expected the orbit of earth to expand every so slightly around the sun. I assume there would be earthquakes galore over time as the equatorial bulge is replaced by tidal forces from the sun/earth system and the earth tries to reshape.
Jan1-13, 10:28 AM   #12
 
Quote by Astronuc View Post
The part facing the sun would get very hot, and the part facing away from the sun would get very cold. The weather would be very different.
There would be means of moving heat from the hot side to the cold side. Convection of air, boiling & condensation of water, and conduction. Would these processes have the effect of widening the habitable zone between the hot and cold sides or would it eliminate the habitable zone altogether due to the high rate of energy transfer through that area?
Jan1-13, 10:42 AM   #13
K^2
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by Astronuc View Post
The effect of gravity would be greater. One can experience this by going to one of the poles (north or south) where there is not centripetal effect.
Sorry, this statement just bothers me. No centrifugal effect. There is no such thing as centripetal effect, but if there was, it'd be pulling things inwards.
Jan1-13, 01:07 PM   #14
 
Quote by Buckleymanor View Post
If the Earth slowed down slowly then yes, if it suddenly stoped then no.Imagine a skyscraper on a conveyor travelling at 1000mph over a non rotateing Earth or allmost, at the north or south pole.Stop the conveyor at once, it's doubtfull the building would remain in one peice.
In other words, are you are saying, when the earth is stopped from rotating, that anything above an arbitrary surface of the earth will still possess momentum, and anything below the surface will not possess momentum. Where should one make a distinction between above and below this arbitrary surface so that above the surface is not of the earth and below is of the earth. What is so special about sea level or the land that humans walk on that it is incorrectly assumed that we, what we build or what we can see with our eyes is not part of the earth.
That is the problem when answering ficticiuous situations - see the post from HallsofIvy. The criteria in the question were not defined
Jan1-13, 05:52 PM   #15
 
Quote by 256bits View Post
In other words, are you are saying, when the earth is stopped from rotating, that anything above an arbitrary surface of the earth will still possess momentum, and anything below the surface will not possess momentum. Where should one make a distinction between above and below this arbitrary surface so that above the surface is not of the earth and below is of the earth. What is so special about sea level or the land that humans walk on that it is incorrectly assumed that we, what we build or what we can see with our eyes is not part of the earth.
That is the problem when answering ficticiuous situations - see the post from HallsofIvy. The criteria in the question were not defined
Well I thought they were. The OP defined the situation quite clearly, " if the earth suddenly stopped and even put in a couple of exclamation marks!!
As for anything above or below the Earth having momentum when it is stopped.Of course they both have and that the speed of the rotation makes all the difference . It's just that everything below would be better anchored.
Jan1-13, 06:11 PM   #16
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by Buckleymanor View Post
Well I thought they were. The OP defined the situation quite clearly, " if the earth suddenly stopped and even put in a couple of exclamation marks!!
The question as phrased in the OP is unrealistic. It's one of those questions that we see here quite often that asks; If we ignore the laws and theories of physics by allowing "A" to happen, then what do the laws and theories of physics predict will be the effects of "A"? Astronuc correctly rephrased the question back in post number 6.
Jan1-13, 06:19 PM   #17
 
Quote by HallsofIvy View Post
The problem is that the OP didn't say anything about how the "stopping" would occur! GIGO. I was, frankly, tempted to say that we would be up to our necks in Easter Bunnies since we are now allowing any sort of magic to happen!
I'm so glad this thread wasn't locked down for magical reasons, This magic helps to understand what is real as evidenced by some peoples surprise that the effects of gravity would increase.
And a world filled with Easter bunnies can't be all bad.

Also, we'd lose our protective magnetic shield and the solar winds will begin to strip away our atmosphere
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: If earth stops rotating
Thread Forum Replies
motor stops rotating Electrical Engineering 9
what stops the earth from colliding w/ moon? General Physics 12
What happens to us/earth if the earth suddenly stops rotating? General Physics 7
If the earth stops rotating... General Physics 11
Earth rotating Precalculus Mathematics Homework 5