Register to reply

Astrophysics on par with physics? (perception-wise)

by torquemada
Tags: astrophysics, perceptionwise, physics
Share this thread:
torquemada
#1
Jan2-13, 10:15 AM
P: 110
Hi all,

earlier this year I asked about astronomy vs physics, and the general consensus was that, at least in the academic world, astronomy is thought of as fringe in the sense that you won't get hired to a physics post or be able to do physics research, but a physicist could do astronomy. What about an astrophysicist? Is that considered a full blown physicist, like a condensed matter physicist or nuclear physicist? Or is that lumped together with the astronomer in the academic world? thanks
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
FIXD tells car drivers via smartphone what is wrong
Team pioneers strategy for creating new materials
Team defines new biodiversity metric
dipole
#2
Jan2-13, 11:17 AM
P: 440
Yes astrophysics is just one specialization among many. An astrophysistist is just as much a physisist as a particle physisist or any other kind.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Is it wise to study both physics and engineering? Academic Guidance 1
Looking for rural good graduate schools in Physics (Astrophysics, HighEnergy Physics) Academic Guidance 1
Random variables that are triple-wise independent but quadruple-wise dependent Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 2
Relationship help (physics wise that is ;) Engineering Systems & Design 3