astrophysics on par with physics? (perception-wise)

by torquemada
Tags: astrophysics, perceptionwise, physics
torquemada is offline
Jan2-13, 10:15 AM
P: 110
Hi all,

earlier this year I asked about astronomy vs physics, and the general consensus was that, at least in the academic world, astronomy is thought of as fringe in the sense that you won't get hired to a physics post or be able to do physics research, but a physicist could do astronomy. What about an astrophysicist? Is that considered a full blown physicist, like a condensed matter physicist or nuclear physicist? Or is that lumped together with the astronomer in the academic world? thanks
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on
Simplicity is key to co-operative robots
Chemical vapor deposition used to grow atomic layer materials on top of each other
Earliest ancestor of land herbivores discovered
dipole is offline
Jan2-13, 11:17 AM
P: 418
Yes astrophysics is just one specialization among many. An astrophysistist is just as much a physisist as a particle physisist or any other kind.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Is it wise to study both physics and engineering? Academic Guidance 1
Looking for rural good graduate schools in Physics (Astrophysics, HighEnergy Physics) Academic Guidance 1
Random variables that are triple-wise independent but quadruple-wise dependent Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 2
Relationship help (physics wise that is ;) Engineering Systems & Design 3