derivative of cosh x


by Michael_Light
Tags: cosh, derivative
Michael_Light
Michael_Light is offline
#1
Jan10-13, 08:17 AM
P: 117
Click image for larger version

Name:	maths.png
Views:	41
Size:	4.9 KB
ID:	54593

Hi... I read this from my lecture note, but i couldn't understand:

i) the red part, shouldn't it be k =0 instead of k=1?

ii) the third line to the fourth line... i.e.

Click image for larger version

Name:	maths 2.png
Views:	21
Size:	3.0 KB
ID:	54595

I have no idea how to change from the third line to the fourth line..

Can anyone enlighten me? Thanks a lot..
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Going nuts? Turkey looks to pistachios to heat new eco-city
Space-tested fluid flow concept advances infectious disease diagnoses
SpaceX launches supplies to space station (Update)
HallsofIvy
HallsofIvy is offline
#2
Jan10-13, 08:27 AM
Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 38,881
It doesn't matter. Since the terms being summed have a factor of "k", the k= 0 term has value 0.

In general, for power series, [itex]f(x)= \sum_{k=0}^\infty a_kx^k[/itex], the derivative can be written as either [itex]f'(x)= \sum_{k=0}^\infty ka_kx^{k- 1}[/itex] or as [itex]f'(x)= \sum_{k=1}^\infty ka_kx^{k- 1}[/itex] because the k= 0 term is 0.

By making the change of index, n= k- 1, so that k= n+1, the second can be written [itex]f'(x)= \sum_{n=0} (n+1)a_{n+1}x^n[/itex].
THSMathWhiz
THSMathWhiz is offline
#3
Jan16-13, 06:33 PM
P: 11
The first sum can be rewritten as
[itex]\displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^\infty (2k)\frac{x^{2k-1}}{(2k)!}=\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{x^{2k-1}}{(2k-1)!}[/itex]
since [itex](2k)!=(2k)(2k-1)![/itex]. To change the base index, replace [itex]k[/itex] by [itex]k+1[/itex]. You then get the sum
[itex]\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{x^{2k+1}}{(2k+1)!}.[/itex]

mathman
mathman is offline
#4
Jan17-13, 03:42 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 5,935

derivative of cosh x


Quote Quote by Michael_Light View Post
Attachment 54593

Hi... I read this from my lecture note, but i couldn't understand:

i) the red part, shouldn't it be k =0 instead of k=1?

ii) the third line to the fourth line... i.e.

Attachment 54595

I have no idea how to change from the third line to the fourth line..

Can anyone enlighten me? Thanks a lot..
This seems to be a very roundabout way of getting this result.

cosh(x) = (ex + e-x)/2
The derivative = (ex - e-x)/2 =sinh(x).
HallsofIvy
HallsofIvy is offline
#5
Jan17-13, 04:38 PM
Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 38,881
IF cosh(x) has been defined as [itex](e^x+ e^{-x})/2[/itex], yes, that is more direct. However, if cosh(x) has been defined as [itex]\sum_{i=0}^\infty x^{2i}/(2i)![/itex], as is quite possible and apparently as done in the first post, the argument given is more direct.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
D.w.r.t.x (cosh x)^(sin x) Calculus & Beyond Homework 7
sin x =cosh x General Math 12
cos(x) = cosh(x)? Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Cosh x > 1 Calculus & Beyond Homework 4
Derivative of cosh inverse x Calculus & Beyond Homework 1