Register to reply

Future Human intelligence: Superhuman

by Trevor Swords
Tags: future, human, intelligence, superhuman
Share this thread:
Trevor Swords
#1
Dec21-12, 08:19 PM
P: 2
I have watched next world'' Future Superhuman" and they shown what abilities and powers the human being will have in the future. They showned Telepathic communication and what it show is that we will speak to machines and make telepathic calls. Getting smarter was interesting. Digital eye contacts shown that the computer will be everywhere. So I thought that kind of technology was way cool.
So I just watched it on YouTube, so go check it out about future technology.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Wildfires and other burns play bigger role in climate change, professor finds
SR Labs research to expose BadUSB next week in Vegas
New study advances 'DNA revolution,' tells butterflies' evolutionary history
Drakkith
#2
Dec21-12, 08:31 PM
Mentor
Drakkith's Avatar
P: 11,604
A minor point here. I'd say it's not about what we WILL have, but about what we MIGHT have. I can guarantee that we will not have telepathic communication in the traditional sense. Perhaps if we have radio transmitters and receivers implanted we can mimic some form of telepathy, but it's not quite the same.
Curious3141
#3
Dec21-12, 09:50 PM
HW Helper
Curious3141's Avatar
P: 2,943
I predict that humanity will be "smarter" but continue to do very, very stupid things on a regular basis.

Trevor Swords
#4
Dec21-12, 09:54 PM
P: 2
Future Human intelligence: Superhuman

Quote Quote by Curious3141 View Post
I predict that humanity will be "smarter" but continue to do very, very stupid things on a regular basis.
I agree with you. People will just remain weak species but It be nice to have a better civilization of Scientists, Engineers and programmers.
Drakkith
#5
Dec21-12, 09:55 PM
Mentor
Drakkith's Avatar
P: 11,604
The question is, if we turn out smarter, WHY will we be smarter? Are we evolving that way? According to my knowledge on the subject of evolution we are not. Anyone know?
Trevor Swords
#6
Dec21-12, 10:04 PM
P: 2
Quote Quote by Drakkith View Post
The question is, if we turn out smarter, WHY will we be smarter? Are we evolving that way? According to my knowledge on the subject of evolution we are not. Anyone know?
It's just not that humanity is evolving, but our education will be better with digital Aristotle and that will be great for society for better generations.
Drakkith
#7
Dec21-12, 11:51 PM
Mentor
Drakkith's Avatar
P: 11,604
Quote Quote by Trevor Swords View Post
It's just not that humanity is evolving, but our education will be better with digital Aristotle and that will be great for society for better generations.
Perhaps.
ImaLooser
#8
Dec22-12, 01:24 AM
P: 570
Quote Quote by Curious3141 View Post
I predict that humanity will be "smarter" but continue to do very, very stupid things on a regular basis.
Most people don't like to learn and are successful in avoiding such. So it doesn't matter how much info is available, they just ignore it. Anti-intellectualism is strong. Just look at China's cultural revolution, or Cambodia in the 70's.

If they ever get a telepathic link (some sort of embedded radio is possible) then most people would use it to experience porn.

The communication of scientific knowledge has increased hugely. I used to search libraries, and everything is so much easier. I wonder why scientific progress doesn't seem to have accelerated. Perhaps the easy discoveries have all been made and it will just keep getting harder. But now the limit is how fast someone can learn, not the availability of info. We don't know what to do to make learning faster.

There is no rule that things have to progress. Music has gone way backward in the last 40 years.

You might be interested in the Orion's Arm project. It has to do with superintelligence.
256bits
#9
Dec22-12, 12:23 PM
P: 1,425
Quote Quote by Curious3141 View Post
I predict that humanity will be "smarter" but continue to do very, very stupid things on a regular basis.
the antithsies would be:
"I predict that humanity will be "stupider" but continue to do very, very smart things on a regular basis.
Curious3141
#10
Dec22-12, 06:36 PM
HW Helper
Curious3141's Avatar
P: 2,943
Quote Quote by 256bits View Post
the antithsies would be:
"I predict that humanity will be "stupider" but continue to do very, very smart things on a regular basis.
I'm hard-pressed to decide which is the more cynical position.
Ryan_m_b
#11
Dec26-12, 08:32 AM
Mentor
Ryan_m_b's Avatar
P: 5,406
Quote Quote by Trevor Swords View Post
I agree with you. People will just remain weak species but It be nice to have a better civilization of Scientists, Engineers and programmers.
As I scientist I can safely say that this sounds like an incredibly boring future. Why on earth would we want only these people? I would like a future wherein people didn't play the elite card.

Edit: forgot to add that being a scientist, engineer or programmer is not a guarantee of being a good person nor of being intelligent across the board.
Timewalker6
#12
Jan25-13, 12:47 AM
P: 2
Quote Quote by Trevor Swords View Post
I agree with you. People will just remain weak species but It be nice to have a better civilization of Scientists, Engineers and programmers.
The problem is that if all of society did this then the individual scientist would beb etter off giving up on their career because if they try something odds are it's already been done. Society would need engineers to go above and beyond to provide something new, and programmers would repeatedly make the same programs over and over again. Soon society would fall into a sort of ignorance again after learning everything we have felt we can learn and then the cycle starts over.
GTOM
#13
Feb2-13, 05:38 AM
P: 110
I think, because automation can solve more and more things, future humans will have to take creative jobs, and operate in networks to sum their capabilities.
It seems to me, that a network of people can still outsmart any electronic brain, and AIs that can think like human, wont be viable, they are just more expensive than humans.
I think telepathy (with implants, that could be turned off if someone wants privacy) would be a great thing.
Vierstein
#14
Feb7-13, 02:22 PM
P: 15
What show was that? Telepathy is quack as far as I know. I am more concerned that our intelligence is an anomaly and that will be eventually straightened out down the line.
ZapperZ
#15
Feb8-13, 06:27 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
ZapperZ's Avatar
P: 29,239
Locked, pending moderation.

Discussions in this forum are not exempted from our PF Rules.

Zz.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Pounds of Force inherent in human (or superhuman) Feats of Strength General Physics 0
Future Human: Making human's invisible without a suit Biology 16
Can Artificial Intelligence ever reach Human Intelligence? General Discussion 274
What about trust in future US Intelligence & Claims? Current Events 2
Artificial Intelligence vs Human Intelligence General Discussion 38