Register to reply

Proof by Induction

by Bachelier
Tags: induction, proof
Share this thread:
Bachelier
#1
Feb1-13, 10:34 PM
P: 376
Is it a solid proof to show that the closure of a union equals the union of the closures of the sets via induction?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
New type of solar concentrator desn't block the view
Researchers demonstrate ultra low-field nuclear magnetic resonance using Earth's magnetic field
Asian inventions dominate energy storage systems
Number Nine
#2
Feb1-13, 11:24 PM
P: 772
Quote Quote by Bachelier View Post
Is it a solid proof to show that the closure of a union equals the union of the closures of the sets via induction?
How can we possibly know if your proof is valid if you don't show us your proof? Still, I'm not entirely sure why you would use induction here. Are you only considering the union of finitely many sets?
jedishrfu
#3
Feb1-13, 11:30 PM
P: 2,938
A proof is a proof no matter if you use induction or some direct method as long as the logic of each step is impeccable.

There are some math purists who disdain induction proofs for some theorems and prefer other styles of proof but thats beyond my math understanding to explain here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brouwer...rt_controversy

Bachelier
#4
Feb2-13, 11:22 PM
P: 376
Proof by Induction

Quote Quote by Number Nine View Post
How can we possibly know if your proof is valid if you don't show us your proof? Still, I'm not entirely sure why you would use induction here. Are you only considering the union of finitely many sets?
Yes of course. I'm talking about finite sets. I found a different way to prove it though. But the proof by induction crossed my mind.

I should work it out some time and post it here. It seems feasible.
Bachelier
#5
Feb2-13, 11:22 PM
P: 376
Quote Quote by jedishrfu View Post
A proof is a proof no matter if you use induction or some direct method as long as the logic of each step is impeccable.

There are some math purists who disdain induction proofs for some theorems and prefer other styles of proof but thats beyond my math understanding to explain here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brouwer...rt_controversy
great article. Thanks


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Proof by induction Calculus & Beyond Homework 10
Proof by induction Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Help with induction proof Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
Sum of n^3 = (sum of n)^2 induction proof Calculus & Beyond Homework 4
Induction Proof Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 3