| New Reply |
Expected Value and First Order Stochastic Dominance |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Feb4-13, 03:21 PM | #1 |
|
|
Expected Value and First Order Stochastic Dominance
Dear All:
Given two random variables X and Y, if I have established the relationship E[X]>=E[Y], does this necessarily imply that X must have a first-order-stochastic dominance over Y? I know that first order stochastic dominance implies that the mean value of the dominating random variable be greater than the other variable but I am trying to find out whether the reverse must hold. Thanks in advance. Regards. |
| Feb4-13, 03:30 PM | #2 |
|
Recognitions:
|
|
| Feb4-13, 03:46 PM | #3 |
|
|
Great! Thanks a lot. That's what I guessed too but just wanted to make sure. I appreciate your fast reply.
|
| New Reply |
| Tags |
| means, stochastic dominance |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Expected Value and First Order Stochastic Dominance
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Matter dominance | Cosmology | 1 | ||
| Stochastic Processes, Poisson Process | Expected value of a sum of functions. | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 2 | ||
| Order Statistics, Unbiasedness, and Expected Values | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 2 | ||
| Incomplete Dominance and Codominance | Biology | 1 | ||
| Expected value of a third order statistic? | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 1 | ||