Derivative by Leibniz's integral rule


by Undoubtedly0
Tags: derivative, integral, leibniz, rule
Undoubtedly0
Undoubtedly0 is offline
#1
Feb8-13, 08:12 PM
P: 94
Hi all. I am looking at the functions [itex]\tau(x,y)[/itex], [itex]T(x,y)[/itex], and [itex]R(T)[/itex] related by

[tex] \tau(x,y) = \int_{\pi}^{T(x,y)} R(\theta) d\theta .[/tex]

It seems that by Leibniz's integral rule

[tex] \frac{\partial \tau}{\partial x} = \int_\pi^{T} \frac{\partial R}{\partial x} d\theta + R(T)\frac{\partial T}{\partial x}. [/tex]

It seems that [itex]\partial R / \partial x [/itex] need not be zero, yet another resource tells me that

[tex] \frac{\partial \tau}{\partial x} = R(T)\frac{\partial T}{\partial x} .[/tex]

Have I gone wrong somewhere? Thanks!
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Going nuts? Turkey looks to pistachios to heat new eco-city
Space-tested fluid flow concept advances infectious disease diagnoses
SpaceX launches supplies to space station (Update)
lurflurf
lurflurf is offline
#2
Feb8-13, 08:51 PM
HW Helper
P: 2,151
Sometimes ∂R/∂x is zero, sometimes not. Here you have written R(θ) which is often a hint that ∂R/∂x is zero, otherwise one usually writes R(θ,x).
Undoubtedly0
Undoubtedly0 is offline
#3
Feb8-13, 09:16 PM
P: 94
[itex]\theta[/itex] is a dummy variable that stands for [itex]T = T(x,y)[/itex], which I think means that [itex]R(\theta) = R(\theta(x,y))[/itex], correct?

lurflurf
lurflurf is offline
#4
Feb9-13, 12:55 AM
HW Helper
P: 2,151

Derivative by Leibniz's integral rule


$$\dfrac{d}{dt}\int^{\mathrm{b}(t)}_{\mathrm{a}(t)} \mathrm{f}(x,t) \, \mathrm{dx}=\int^{\mathrm{b}(t)}_{\mathrm{a}(t)} \dfrac{\partial \mathrm{f}}{\partial t} \, \mathrm{dx}+\mathrm{f}(\mathrm{b}(t),t) \mathrm{b} ^ \prime (t)-\mathrm{f}(\mathrm{a}(t),t) \mathrm{a} ^ \prime (t)$$

No the dummy variable takes all the values in a set like (pi,T), it does not depend on the end point. The other term gives the effect of the boundary. Leibniz's integral rule breaks the dependence of the integral on the variable into dependence on the the interior and the boundary. Usual examples are cars on a highway or water in a pipe or electricity in a wire.
Undoubtedly0
Undoubtedly0 is offline
#5
Feb9-13, 08:20 AM
P: 94
So if we take it to be the case that

[tex] \frac{\partial \tau}{\partial x} = R(T)\frac{\partial T}{\partial x},[/tex]

then what would be the value of [itex] \partial \tau/\partial x |_{x=c} [/itex]?

[tex] \left.\frac{\partial \tau}{\partial x}\right|_{x=c} = R(T)|_{x=c} \cdot\left.\frac{\partial T}{\partial x}\right|_{x=c}[/tex]

What is meant by [itex] R(T)|_{x=c}[/itex]?
elfmotat
elfmotat is offline
#6
Feb9-13, 02:45 PM
elfmotat's Avatar
P: 260
Quote Quote by Undoubtedly0 View Post
What is meant by [itex] R(T)|_{x=c}[/itex]?
[tex]R(T)=R(T(x,y))[/tex]

Let's say you're given the point (a,b). Plug that point into T and it returns a number (call it c): T(a,b)=c. Then you plug this number into R to get R(T): R(T(a,b))=R(c)=d.

If you're only given x=a but y remains a variable, then T(a,y) is a function dependent only on the variable y. Thus R(T) is also a function dependent only on y. Plugging in a particular value of y will return a single number for R(T).


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Leibniz's Rule Proof With Definition of a Derivative Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
Commuting derivative/Integral (not FTC or Leibniz) Calculus 2
[SOLVED] Leibniz' Integral rule Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
Leibniz Rule (derivative of an integral) Calculus 0
Leibniz integral rule "proof"? General Math 2